So, I'm a generally a pretty competitive person. Doesn't matter what I play at, I get into it. I mean REALLY into it. And, of course, I love to win. Now, if I lose, I don't get too upset. I get a little bit frustrated but I rarely get angry (unless I'm playing a video game against the AI but that's because I don't like the idea of losing to anything that doesn't have it's own free thinking process). But I fucking hate when something ends in a draw.
I was at my buddy's house and we were playing chess (I wasn't joking when I said that it doesn't matter what it is, I get into it). We were playing and I was winning. Then, he "accidentally" pulled that three-move-repetition bullshit which lead the game into a tie. And I actually got pissed. Not upset. Not slightly flustered. Legitimate fucking anger. Over CHESS!!! And it had nothing to do with the fact that I was winning. I could've been about to lose and if it came to that (even though if HE was winning, I bet he wouldn't have said shit about a stalemate cause that's how he is) I wouldn't have tried to have it end in a draw, even though the rules stipulate such an event is to end in a stalemate.
This little incident lead me to the thought: Is it better to end in a stalemate and have everything be all tied up and even, or is it better to just face defeat and walk away a stronger person because you learned that you have to develop more experience?
And, NO. This doesn't just apply to... Board games. God, I can't believe I actually got angry.
I was at my buddy's house and we were playing chess (I wasn't joking when I said that it doesn't matter what it is, I get into it). We were playing and I was winning. Then, he "accidentally" pulled that three-move-repetition bullshit which lead the game into a tie. And I actually got pissed. Not upset. Not slightly flustered. Legitimate fucking anger. Over CHESS!!! And it had nothing to do with the fact that I was winning. I could've been about to lose and if it came to that (even though if HE was winning, I bet he wouldn't have said shit about a stalemate cause that's how he is) I wouldn't have tried to have it end in a draw, even though the rules stipulate such an event is to end in a stalemate.
This little incident lead me to the thought: Is it better to end in a stalemate and have everything be all tied up and even, or is it better to just face defeat and walk away a stronger person because you learned that you have to develop more experience?
And, NO. This doesn't just apply to... Board games. God, I can't believe I actually got angry.


?

I'm the kind of person who plays a game for fun, rather than to win. It doesn't quite give me that raw edge some competitive people would have, but it doesn't make me a worse player than them.
I true gentleman takes no prisoners.
I simply don't like losing, and I've been known to make damned near impossible comebacks from just about anything. It's what I do. 
I don't care if it's childish or anything