I like #2 the best. It has i nice background and it blends nicely with it. The effect around it makes it very nice.
#1 just didn't appeal to me, mainly because it seemed as though the render is just placed on the background. If it was blended into the background a bit i think if would look great.
#2 just looks like a stock image has been taken for the background, a fractual render has been slapped on top of that with the sprite just whacked in the center. The blending of the fractual whatever it is thing, really hurts my eyes... the purple random lighting coming off it... just doesn't suit my tastes.
#1 stuck closer to the rules in my opinion of making the sprite the focus of attention.
Number one, for the simple reason of not blinding me.
#2 In all seriousness the really bright background makes the image look bad and the sprite doesn't look like it is in focus.
I'll go with 1,even though it doesn't blend in.
Why I didn't vote for 2,it's very bright that makes me try to understand what happens in the background or around the sprite.
#3. I like the text, sprite used, and the swirl of colors used. Plus the size plays a bit of a part because I like to see somewhat larger sigs instead.
Do like the color of the BG in the first one though!
My vote is for #3. It's the only one that's blended well. Like others have said about #1 the sprite shows no attempts of blending. I think if it was blended with the background it would have made a better sig. #2 was kinda all over the place and just doesn't look that great.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.