I think people have mistaken literacy as the only real criterion, I'd imagine Shu assumed we are all competent in reading and writing
I find it odd that almost none of the members have rated themselves at five or lower, five is the average so it seems bizarre that so many are above the norm. After all if everyone was above the average then it would not longer be the average, ohohoho etc.
I am a five, my writing is comprehensible and contains trace elements of independent thought, personality, and what I hope passes as humour
If a 10/10 is a perfect score, does that mean most people are placing themselves in league with Wilde, Joyce, Huxley, Card, and King?
I find it odd that almost none of the members have rated themselves at five or lower, five is the average so it seems bizarre that so many are above the norm. After all if everyone was above the average then it would not longer be the average, ohohoho etc.
I am a five, my writing is comprehensible and contains trace elements of independent thought, personality, and what I hope passes as humour
If a 10/10 is a perfect score, does that mean most people are placing themselves in league with Wilde, Joyce, Huxley, Card, and King?

I'm usually at my best at writing when I'm given free will and as much time as I need to write it down on paper and/or type it up. If I absolutely had to give myself a rating, I'd say 7 or 8/10. I've been recognized and won several rewards back at high school whenever it came down to competitions or contests, and have been told a few times I should be an author.
But as of right now, until school starts off at a good balanced schedule, I've been taking a break off of writing in general. I'll be getting back into it sooner or later. 
.