Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Technology has the potential of doing that, but just look around. A majority of people have intercourse nowadays due to the pleasure aspect. I highly doubt humankind will replace something they love to do. If anything, they'll use the technology to become more effective at eliminating the consequences for having sex so they can just do it more. Personally that disgusts me, but nothing I say will make a difference anyway.Sex is disgusting and a freaking insult to human dignity, yet were cursed to do it to survive. For now, at least. Future technology may make all reproduction occur in laboratories, and with all of the advances in genetic technology coming out recently, this doesn't look so far off.
Heck, people of the future may look back at us the way we look at the people of ancient Sparta. They weeded out weak children by leaving all male newborns on cliffs for three days and only taking the survivors. We weed out bad parents by forcing them into poverty or having to put their kid up for adoption if they have the stupidity to have a child while underage. It's sickening, but like in ancient Sparta, we just use the same "It doesn't hurt you, so don't complain" excuse.
Rhea, I would appreciate it if you don't compare people to animals here. If you haven't noticed, we have the capability to wipe any of those species off the face of the earth while they can't do the same to us, and it certainly isn't due to our ability to have sex. People don't need to have sex any more than they need to drink or smoke, and any statement to the contrary is ignorant and most certainly not "moral".
This whole argument is getting a little ridiculous- yes, I know we need to have sex, and I know there are examples of societies that have been wiped out by banning sex, but there is NO excuse for ANYONE under the age of 17 should have sex. It just should not be happening, period.
We're talking about LEGAL underage sex here. It wouldn't be much of a debate if the other side had to defend criminals, see?
I was deeply disappointed to see Rhea say something along the lines of the partner being "sorely disappointed that you don't know what you're doing," as if placing guilt that some of us haven't thrown away our virginity and pressuring to go out and find someone at this very moment. Maybe you didn't intend that, but that's how it came across, and I found it disgusting.I don't want to be with someone to find out they merely loved how I was in bed versus me as a person. I'm not some object to be used and disposed of.
*chuckles* Alright, thank you for clarifying. However, do you think it wise to react to all natural temptations? Think about it: if you acted on every natural impulse you've had, you'd probably be in a lot of trouble. I.e. a kid side-swiped your car and took off laughing. Natural impulse - nail his sorry little ___ right?Lol. I was joking. I did say I have respect for those of you who can resist your urges. Don't get me wrong for taking choosing to take the side that I've been arguing for...I'm not a ferocious sex-craving nympho; not in the least.
I just don't see any logic in purposefully disregarding your natural temptations.![]()
No, lol.
It was agains the law where I lived to have sex under the age of 16.
If 16 year olds did have sex (which is usually out of their parents control anyway), it's considered statatory rape to sleep with someone more than two years your senior.
Im telling your right now... DONT... It can really screw your life up BELIVE MEI'm only 14 (no du) and my friends are telling me to fuck my girl and she only 14 too and my friends are 12 and 15