Well I have to say this is very interesting set up you have here.
Are you going have Judge and a Jury also?
and how many "teams" are you planning on having?
And as far as the FF Questions are concern, most of those are going be very opinionated so providing true sources as to why one hero is the best or why one game is better than the other would be very tough.
The judges are anyone who watches. I am thinking two poles sounds good. 1 reflecting the viewers opinions, and the other reflecting which side presented better.
Teams will be figured by the setups and who is willing to join on which debates. Or the teams will be created at the users own discretion and they will open up an invitation to a debate with their own team.
As far as FF goes, I think philisophical debates are fun too, so its worth a go as well.
I think maybe we can make a case ruling. IF the voting time does not net the right setup of teams within a week, then the sides will can be randomly selected... that way we have first choice at our own sides, and have a fail safe plan, along with enough time to prepare. HOW does that sound guys? And I think like anything it could have settings. For example if you have a team you wouldn't very well subject yourself to the random test right? However, perhaps we can make a couple debates a week, 1 for random, 1 for standard, and 1 for FF
I think we should make this start and work together from the beggining, before start leaning upon the assistance of an admin or voluteering them to assign us places. We should demonstrate that this can work first, before we can rely on their availability.
Last edited: