Do you think Squall survived in the end or no?
I had always thought that he did with the ending, but now I'm not so sure. I read an article saying that he didn't survive... in fact they tried to prove that Squall had died at the end of disc 1 when ice shards were hurled into his body, and that he is somehow tied to Griever (one of the final bosses). I don't believe he did die at the end of disc 1, but it made me think more about the ending of the game. For example, if Squall is in fact alive then why didn't it just show him along with Rinoa through the camera lens? What does everyone else think about the ending?
I had always thought that he did with the ending, but now I'm not so sure. I read an article saying that he didn't survive... in fact they tried to prove that Squall had died at the end of disc 1 when ice shards were hurled into his body, and that he is somehow tied to Griever (one of the final bosses). I don't believe he did die at the end of disc 1, but it made me think more about the ending of the game. For example, if Squall is in fact alive then why didn't it just show him along with Rinoa through the camera lens? What does everyone else think about the ending?


. Maybe it was Stockholm Syndrome?! A highly elite mercenary force picking a new recruit 17 year old leader still makes me laugh though. I understand that the games are going to have their main character in some sort of focal point but yeah. Come on. Haha. Can't argue that is kinda a bit... Well you know
it's a fun theory, but no. i've already made a giant post about this i think but icba to find it right now. the thing about writing and engaging in stories that deal with time-travel and crap is that people will always have theories about how two ccharacters can't exist at the same time or whatever, but they're forgetting that it's time travel. the past exists until the future destroys the thing in the past. but both past and future can interact with each other until one destroys the other.