
Come on now, instead of picking pieces and shreds of my argument, read all my posts thoroughly. The Bible doesn't state "Thou shall not burn books", but does have to say it in that literal sense for it to be deemed wrong?
The answer is no. In fact, that is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. It's because of that kind of general context that more complex teachings of the Bible become ill-told.
No sin is greater than another. My favorite teaching in the Quran, for example, is that killing one man is like killing all mankind, and saving one man is like saving all mankind.
The Bible practically states the same, give or take a few puns. It's not like we're dealing with two totally separate teachings here- they both have a close general concept of morality.
So you tell me- what do Christians do that is better than Muslims? Should it be left to extremists to decide the morality of them because Christians won't aknowledge their own blasphemers? Muslims aknowledge theirs everyday and to no avail for the prejudice they face.
Burning holy books is a construct of vanity, not a construct of God. That's pretty much the point I was trying to get across. And it only helps to stir up trouble. It's just as much a responsibility for Christians to aknowledge it as anyone else. Unfortunately, it doesn't happen that way_