Am I right, Ladies?

Status
Not open for further replies.
tumblr_lu0mc2BOIO1qd5giho1_500.jpg
 
Because they promote guilt on white men, make up stupid reasons why feminism should still exist, protest fast food chains because their owners believe in traditional marriage, blame guns whenever a shooting happens, doesn't care about defense in robberies because most of them doing it are liberals, say that it's racist for saying that, take law enforcement to court because they use black silhouettes at the shooting range, wave gay flags around Catholic communions expecting to get blessed, pioneers and pushers of political correctness..

Come on man, you're slacking. You left out the obvious parts. They also believe in global warming, which is clearly just a ridiculous left-wing global conspiracy exacerbated by brainless liberal "scientists". They also hate all this economic inequality going on unfettered, making up lies that the current glorious capitalist system is somehow flawed, so clearly they're communists. And since they're communists, they must also be allies with that great man Stalin and his KGB. And since they like Stalin, they must hate freedom. As they hate freedom, they are not American, and should probably move to foreign liberal hellholes, like the Scandinavian countries. And even if they're not communists, they are most definitely too lazy to work and just want the state to give things to them. And clearly, they are heathens because they are ungodly, which consequentially means they have no morals, therefore allowing Satan to win, and because Satan is winning, all these bad things are happening.
 

Oh yeah, bring up Australia, bring Scandinavia, bring up all these countries in which there was never really anything to worry about anyways as far as crime. It's nice that some countries can put up their walls and live peacefully.
But, welcome to reality- less crime there just means more crime in other places. Guns don't just disappear; criminals don't just stop being mass produced. Here in the real world, owning a gun is actually a considerable insurance policy for your own preservation.

This is where liberal arguments simply fail.
 
oh so we're allowed to ignore clear evidence if we don't agree with it? that makes debating so much better for everyone.

It's not evidence, it's a pipe dream that the rest of the world can simply be without private gun ownership. Have liberals ever thought to observe the countries which ban gun ownership before the laws were passed? They weren't places where owning a gun was necessary anyway, which is exactly why such laws are even able to be passed in those *democratic* countries, where the people have a say. In others, like America, you see that gun ownership is prime. That's because in America, you are better off being strapped and the majority of people recognize that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top