....If grammar requires that it be capitalized, how can it being capitalized be used as evidence that it's related to Christianity? It can't. That's circular logic. The premise of that argument is flawed by its very nature.
Grammar calls for the start of the limit to be capitalized (when you brought up Chaos, which is a name, so its supposed to be capped lol). The fact that The Gospel is a "thing" (I'll try to keep it in simple steps) it has to be capped. Um....hm, oh! Like Place nouns: The Great Lakes, New York, or Lake Erie. The fact that gospel turned and made "The Gospel" is Christian. Its a "thing" so it gets capitalized.
If your trying to apply logic to the discussion, I think you need to first step back from the PC and take a look at your posts and then look up Heteronym, gospel, The Gospel and gospel's past and whatever else I'm talking about. You can also look up nouns, place nouns, adjectives, verbs, action verbs, pretense, past pretense, present pretense and things like that. Or just major in Linguistics. :/
Secondly, I don't hate Christians or Christianity simply because they're Christian or because it's Christianity. I grew up Catholic. The vast majority of my family are practicing Catholics. I live in the South. Everybody I know is Christian. To be anti-Christian for the hell of it is ludicrous, and frankly, I'd rather you not impugn my character in such a manner.
As I said -- the way you respond to Christians or Christianity at all(I've sorta avoided some threads because of it) is rather harsh and comes off hateful. You can grow up in a Christian area and still be a hater.
I can grow up a Christian (which I initially didn't) and still hate it. Just because you grew up around it doesn't mean you can't hate it. My father grew up with a Catholic family and parents and hates religion and is a Atheist.
Regardless, my personal beliefs about Christianity have nothing to do with my argument, or the information contained therein. Ad hominem attacks are a logical fallacy. Argue the information, not the source.
And finally, until you show me evidence of Aeris worshipping Jesus, she's not Christian. She simply appears in a game that borrows from Christian imagery.
Actually, if you have a biased view, you can't really discuss it since you see it in one light and refuse to listen to anything, therefore ending the "argument" (which is a debate actually), despite what is brought. There is a reason its called "biased". If I was a religion hater and didn't want to hear a single word (in your case, the simple idea of a possibility of Aerith being a Christian), I'd be biased.
Did you...miss all my previous information? Did the links, descriptions, images and everything else, get cut out when I posted it?

That my friend, is evidence. Its the matter if you'll take it or not that is the issue at hand here. :/
Wow wow, did I say Aerith worshiped Jesus? We are discussing the possibility of her religion and I'm discussing the possibility of her being a Christian.
I'll say it again -- you come off as a hater (biased) person right now.
*sorry for any grammar mistakes -- its pretty late lol*