How to win a debate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ayumi Hamasaki

Ayumi Hamasaki

It's a beautiful dream, but a dream is earned
Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
1,668
Location
Kentucky
Gil
21
Step 1- Thinly veiled insults

Step 2- Misconstrue whatever is said to your purpose

Step 3- Actual insults

Step 4- Repeat yourself

Step 5- Use the "more experienced/smarter than you" excuse

Step 6 - repeat yourself some more

Step 7 - Quote the dictionary whether it has any relevance or not

Step 8 - Insult until victory

And there you have it, how to win a debate like a pro. :wacky:

If you thought the point of winning a debate was to convince the other person, you are sadly mistaken. The point is to make the other person submit under your jackas-----your logic. :wacky:
 
no you give bribes

fucking noob
 
No, this is how you guys argue:


1. Present a topic.

2. Say something stupid.

3. Get pissed off when your mental superior tells you you're wrong.

4. Deny what you said, even when it's quoted back for you.

5. Say that any attempts to clarify the situation to you is "off topic".

6. Bitch about it in the spam coliseum and the shoutbox.

7. Pat yourself on the back.

That's about it, as far as I can see it.
 
Ke$ha said:
Step 1- Thinly veiled insults
Click to expand...

None of my insults are thinly veiled.

Step 2- Misconstrue whatever is said to your purpose
Click to expand...

Maybe you should be clear in what you're saying. Or maybe I do get it right, and you realize how fucking retarded you sound, so you try to damage control it back to something acceptable. From the record of the posters on this website, that seems much more likely.

Step 3- Actual insults
Click to expand...

I'm just being realistic. You're clearly too fucking dense to understand subtlety.

Step 4- Repeat yourself
Click to expand...

If you got it the first three times I posted, this wouldn't be necessary.

Step 5- Use the "more experienced/smarter than you" excuse
Click to expand...

I am smarter than you. The outcome of every single one of these debates demonstrates that.

Step 6 - repeat yourself some more
Click to expand...

If you got it the first four times I posted, this wouldn't be necessary.

Step 7 - Quote the dictionary whether it has any relevance or not
Click to expand...

Stop misusing words, then. If you ask what "science" means, I'm going to tell you what science means. Apparently, you need these terms defined, because you don't understand what they mean at all. You might think it's not relevant, if you're stupid.

Step 8 - Insult until victory
Click to expand...

It's not the insults that win the debates. It's the logic that I present. The insults just make me feel better about how fucking retarded you'd have to be for it to be necessary that I explain this simple shit to you.

YOU BOIL THE WATER

YOU POUR THE PACKET

And there you have it, how to win a debate like a pro. :wacky:
Click to expand...

I do this for free.

If you thought the point of winning a debate was to convince the other person, you are sadly mistaken. The point is to make the other person submit under your jackas-----your logic. :wacky:
Click to expand...

Convince the other person? Listen, when I get into a debate with a logical person about a topic that we both understand very well, none of the previous steps have to happen. We are perfectly capable of carrying on a civil discussion that ends with one of us convincing the other, and both parties enjoying a richer perspective thanks to the debate.

You are not logical people. You are mental infants who would not be swayed out of your basement of ignorance by the most earth-shattering of proofs. You are content in claiming that you are "agnostic not atheist", without understanding what either of those terms you so gleefully throw around mean, or that you are "an open-minded Christian", when what you are is a weak-minded fool who not only fell for a backwards theology with no empirical support or basis in reality, but you are to fucking spineless to stand up for it and assert that you're right. You writhing maggots are not worth the keystrokes I invest in you.

Understand that it's not the fact that I am so much better informed than you that makes me better than you. It's not my confidence in my answers that you lack. It's not the fact that I am more eloquent than you could ever hope to be. It's something much more than that. I am simply your superior, in every way, and you could never hope to match me. You are my inferiors, and it saddens me that my every attempt to inform you about the world is met with this sort of disdain for knowledge and reason. You are not fit to be my slaves. It saddens me, yes, but it makes sense. You see my power, my greatness, and it scares you. I get it.

Next time, though, don't react with such hostility. I'm just making you better than you would be without me.

Smell ya later.
 
Emyunoxious said:
None of my insults are thinly veiled.



Maybe you should be clear in what you're saying. Or maybe I do get it right, and you realize how fucking retarded you sound, so you try to damage control it back to something acceptable. From the record of the posters on this website, that seems much more likely.



I'm just being realistic. You're clearly too fucking dense to understand subtlety.



If you got it the first three times I posted, this wouldn't be necessary.



I am smarter than you. The outcome of every single one of these debates demonstrates that.



If you got it the first four times I posted, this wouldn't be necessary.



Stop misusing words, then. If you ask what "science" means, I'm going to tell you what science means. Apparently, you need these terms defined, because you don't understand what they mean at all. You might think it's not relevant, if you're stupid.



It's not the insults that win the debates. It's the logic that I present. The insults just make me feel better about how fucking retarded you'd have to be for it to be necessary that I explain this simple shit to you.

YOU BOIL THE WATER

YOU POUR THE PACKET



I do this for free.



Convince the other person? Listen, when I get into a debate with a logical person about a topic that we both understand very well, none of the previous steps have to happen. We are perfectly capable of carrying on a civil discussion that ends with one of us convincing the other, and both parties enjoying a richer perspective thanks to the debate.

You are not logical people. You are mental infants who would not be swayed out of your basement of ignorance by the most earth-shattering of proofs. You are content in claiming that you are "agnostic not atheist", without understanding what either of those terms you so gleefully throw around mean, or that you are "an open-minded Christian", when what you are is a weak-minded fool who not only fell for a backwards theology with no empirical support or basis in reality, but you are to fucking spineless to stand up for it and assert that you're right. You writhing maggots are not worth the keystrokes I invest in you.

Understand that it's not the fact that I am so much better informed than you that makes me better than you. It's not my confidence in my answers that you lack. It's not the fact that I am more eloquent than you could ever hope to be. It's something much more than that. I am simply your superior, in every way, and you could never hope to match me. You are my inferiors, and it saddens me that my every attempt to inform you about the world is met with this sort of disdain for knowledge and reason. You are not fit to be my slaves. It saddens me, yes, but it makes sense. You see my power, my greatness, and it scares you. I get it.

Next time, though, don't react with such hostility. I'm just making you better than you would be without me.

Smell ya later.
Click to expand...
mmm aha.
 
Or you could do it the way fuckin' politicians do it.

1. Present ideas
2. When opponent attacks ideas, you turn around and bring up something from their past
3. Plumber Joe is your best friend
4. Bring up something else about opponents past
5. Blame the other party for problems the country currently faces
6. Blame opponent for not doing anything to try to stop said problems
7. Bring up more skeletons.


On a slightly serious note, I've found the best way to win a debate is to not present first. I remember back in high school, we had to debate a topic with a classmate (whom we knew ahead of time). Well, I prepared to no end (I had notes and everything), and my "oppoenent" didn't do ANYTHING. When it came time to debate, I started off, and he was somehow able to counter everything I said. So either he is really good at debating, or I suck at debating, or not starting off gives you a slight advantage. I hate debating.
 
or i could just tell you you're wrong and im right over and over again until you're blue in the face

:elmo:
 
Emyunoxious said:
Aw, is this baby's first debate? Look kid, saying it over and over again won't make it true.
Click to expand...

who the hell are you? no one cares, your opinion sucks:ahmed:
 
i'm glad you're willing to lend a hand in settin this dumb muthafucka straight :ahmed:

now take his lunch money, i want a soda :ahmed:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top