Square-Enix Sues Final Fantasy Cosplay Parody For $325,000.

Abstract Debauchery

High Mage of Loathing
Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
3,322
Age
36
Location
Nexus
Gil
4
advent-children-pakkuri-2.jpg


advent-children-pakkuri-3.jpg


advent-children-pakkuri.jpg


Square Enix has sued the producers of a music video containing cosplay recreations of scenes from its CG movie Final Fantasy VII Advent Children, and has been awarded a 400,000,000 won ($325,000) settlement for copyright violation.

The basis of the case is that Korean producer “Phantom Productions” violated Square’s copyrights and used “modified” sections of the movie without permission, in a successful music video used for commercial purposes. Korean courts agreed, and ordered Phantom to pay damages.

It is certainly undeniable that the video resembles the movie very closely.

Whether it actually used sections of the movie as Square’s lengthy crowing insists is less apparent, though courts recognised the fact, so it is presumably the case. However, it does appears that the commercial cosplay was also an issue…

Japanese commentators’ usual hatred of Korea is readily apparent in the general response, which is delighted. However, Japanese producers are famously no stranger to occasionally making “tributes” to other works, so

there seems to be a double standard at play.

Additionally, a substantial number of Japanese cosplayers freely make unauthorised use of copyrighted properties in commercially created parody works, some on a highly commercial basis.

Whether parody or plagiarism, cosplayers will doubtless be concerned if the precedent spreads beyond Korea, none more so than TMA…

Source: Sankaku Complex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh whoa, this is sooooo old. I know I read about this a few times months ago xD

Yeah, I think most people can see that this wasn't an unfair verdict. It clearly was a ripped off scene of Advent Children (although they tried to change up the context in the music video, I think...)
 
Yeah, it was out last year, but we couldn't find a thread about it, so we thought it might be interesting. If you watch the video, it was rather well done. However, anyone with half a brain can tell that SE deserved to win the case.

Although, sueing for that amount of money over something so trivial in the first place... That's another story. :mokken:
 
I don't think it's that trivial. The video was on t.v. where plenty of people saw it. I think what it comes down to is the publicity of said thing. Like, fanfiction and fanart doesn't get scrutinized because I think there simply isn't enough attention on them. Even cosplayers won't be viewed in the millions as opposed to a vid on basic cable, right?

Someone told me about how companies need to protect their property (I.P. or something I think?) and that it usually does vary case-by-case. I think this ad/PV was making money along with being shown on t.v. to millions of viewers, so I think it would make sense for SE to throw around their weight a bit *ponders*
 
Look at the scope of just how many people have played, or even heard of FFVII. Anyone is going look at that video and think, "Oh, that's Tifa!" Instantly bring on thoughts of FFVII and SE.

Even if SE did go uncredited in that video, anyone with half a brain and a video game console will instantly pick up on where it came from.

In all honesty, if it were our company, we would be flattered. If someone on our staff was offended, we would send them a card and ask them to make sure that our name is on it.

We wouldn't go batshit insane and sue the poor guys for 300k. :mokken:
 
oh wow. I saw that video aaaaages ago... I can't believe it took them til last year to sue... Ugh that song... drove me up a wall. anyway, she CLEARLY stole from Square, so I'm glad she got sued... she kinda ruined that scene for me too, because everytime I saw it, that horrid song went though my head >_<


*edit*

I'm surprised she wasn't sued for ripping off Fur Elise as well :hmmm:'

*edit Part deux*


this shows you just how much she ripped it off as well
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, if they didn't credit SE for the right of the characters etc. and they were as simialr as they are, then SE have every right to sue for that amount of money whatever the circumstances.

What this goes to show is that people really have to ask permission when looking at using images/ videos involving absolutely ANY possibility of copyright infringement.

Lets be honest, the music video could have been sent to SE for a huge amount less than 300,000 with an explanation and perhaps a letter saying something along the lines of, "Can we put this on air as it looks a lot like AC". Whether SE said yes or no, it would have saved the creator of the video a serious amount of money, and if it was successful when it came out, then the small cost at the start required for SE to allow them to use these copyrighted characters would have been covered by its success...

So yeah, I actually blame the creator of the video, SE were well within their rights to sue, and I think the amount was decided by the court, it has very little to do with SE turning up and demanding a certain amount.
 
As I have been following the case quite close being a fan of Ivy as a K-pop artist I must say that she had nearly to nothing to do with the MV and that it was more or less her record companies idea which she agreed to.

If I remember correctly one of her last statements on the case was:
"To be fair I actually thought they had the rights to the material we used."

She have since then changed record label to another one due to problems with them like this case.

But still it was fair that S-E sued due to such a big of a rip off.
 
Back
Top