My Viewpoints

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to know why this guy isnt banned.

This all seems way too familiar to Grace Saunders, I take it this forum ahasn't met this guy yet..well looks like you have now, I say Ban.

Also: I'd like to point out that:
Women do own men.
Woman are superior

----

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">A real woman is nice.
A real woman wears her hair long, never short.
A real woman wears skirts, never trousers.
A real woman is a nudist.
A real woman does not work in factories or warehouses.
A real woman is not a feminist.
A real woman does not hit a man.
A real woman does not rule over a man.
A real woman does not manipulate a man (or marry and then divorce a man with the intent to get him busted).
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

But a real man does all those things, amrite?
A normal person is nice, until they get pissed off, I don't see how gender affects this.
Hair length has nothing to do wiith gender either


Let's correct this:<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">A real woman is nice, until scorned.
A real woman wears her hair long or short.
A real woman wears skirts sometimes trousers, maybe shorts now and again?
A real woman can be a nudist.
A real woman may work in factories or warehouses, depending on her skills and whatnot..
A real woman is and isn't a feminist.
A real woman may hit a man, in self-defence of if he is lying scum.
A real woman does or does not rule over a man.
A real woman may or may not manipulate a man (or marry and then divorce a man with the intent to get him busted).
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Last edited:
I would very much like to see you walk into a Dyke bar and start telling the people there they way you think they should behave I would in fact pay a great deal of money to see that happen.
 
Instead of trousers, women may wear skirts, shorts, capris, or skintight leggings. I did attend a workforce training center where female clients are forced to wear trousers. I do not like for women to work in places with a trousers-exclusive dress code, such as some restaurants and factories.

Women were not confined to cooking or housekeeping. The feminist claim is false. It is actually more fun for women to stay at home than to work fulltime. They can play video games, listen to music, watch television or motion pictures, or surf the Internet as long as they want, and they will not have to follow orders of people they are not close to. They can raise their children better. Children of stay-at-home mothers are less likely to become a burden on society as adults than children of full-time working mothers. Feminism rose at a time when labor-saving and leisure-creating devices were not yet invented, and it is men who invented those devices. Female employment is economically necessary in some households.

Wow, how very noble of you.

I really fail to understand exactly *what* you expect of women? I mean, besides the fact that you constantly contradict yourself, but you have never really made it clear why you don't think it's okay to let women dress how they like and be in the workforce. Oh wait, that's right, we are *allowed* to have jobs, just not be particularly good at them. Why thanks, that really makes me feel worth something. What the hell am I still doing at school then trying to do the best I can if I should just sit back and let men get all the glory? I don't think you are taking into account that, besides from the obvious physical and hormonal differences, men and women are the same. Okay, they are different in the fact that no human being is the exactly the same, but women can do everything men can do, and a hell of a lot better depending on who, so why restrict them just because of words written by *MEN* 2000 years ago? Incase you haven't noticed, times they are a-changin. What, so would you consider it acceptable to stone people to death today? Ofcourse, I know that things differ from country to country, but as a whole the world has generally moved on somewhat since Biblical times.


Theres not really much else I can add as everybody else seems to have summed it up well..
 
I'd like to know why this guy isnt banned.

As would I. This is taken from his bio, found here: http://z2.invisionfree.com/TZ_VG_Coalition/index.php?showtopic=917

"Zanarukando has never visited a foreign country, except in 2001 when he visited Yemen due to its age of consent being 9 years of age."

Where's pedobear when you need him? :wacky:

I would very much like to see you walk into a Dyke bar and start telling the people there they way you think they should behave I would in fact pay a great deal of money to see that happen.

I would pay for that as well. Actually I'd like him to write his congressman his views and see if he's taken seriously.
 
I'd like to know why this guy isnt banned
dont ban him, you will just matyr him, and you, will in his mind, validate his point that women are bad/evil or w/e.

all women are real women, there are no jezebels in real life.

just shut up TZ coz your making other guys look bad
 
I just skimmed through that but by god things aint right there.
Lol he failed his drivers theory 4 times he he.
 
Also: I'd like to point out that:
Women do own men.
Woman are superior


Also; I'd like to point out that:

Women do not own men.
Woman are not superior, they are equal.
You are a fucking retard.

How dare you demean an entire gender of people, if that really is your belief, you're stupider than any common so called "feminists."
What gives you the right to say that Women are superior to Men?
 
I feel that discussing feminism and female fashion can lend itself to criticism of me. My opinion on feminism and female fashion seems controversial. I always found that radical feminism and tomboyish female fashion are destructive and divisive. I feel that female fashion going masculine is going out of hand. Just do not expect me to fall in love. I will clear this situation one day. Dusk has threatened me with a ban and has advocated female superiority, which is wrong.
 
Last edited:
I feel that discussing feminism and female fashion can lend itself to criticism of me. My opinion on feminism and female fashion seems controversial. I always found that radical feminism and tomboyish female fashion are destructive and divisive. I feel that female fashion going masculine is going out of hand. Just do not expect me to fall in love. I will clear this situation one day. Dusk has threatened me with a ban and has advocated female superiority, which is wrong.

I was brought up around alot pf boys, I was a tomboy; I climbed trees had play fights got grazed knees a couple of broken bones.
What I wasn't was controversial. I REALLY do not understand your point here at all mate
 
I'd like to know why this guy isnt banned.

This all seems way too familiar to Grace Saunders, I take it this forum ahasn't met this guy yet..well looks like you have now, I say Ban.

Dusk, DO NOT pseudo mod please. Although almost all of us disagree with Teidus it's still his opinion. Staff decides who gets banned or not.
 
Female fashoin that displeases me has been promoted by social pressure and the media, including the Internet, television, and magazines. Many women have been deceived into such fashion. It is not recommended to disagree with me on feminism or female fashion, and my opinion is strongly held in this case. There are sources to back up my opinion on this topic. I can show it to you if you ask. I am not outright opposed to female employment. I find that women are different from men. The majority disagreeing with me does not mean that I should be banned.
 
Last edited:
I was not decieved. I wear what I choose I point blank REFUSED too dress girly as a child, right up too my late teens. Media had nothing to do with it, if it DID I'd of dressed more girly to look like the latest celeb or whatever
 
I feel that discussing feminism and female fashion can lend itself to criticism of me.

Well no shit, sherlock. What gave you that idea?

My opinion on feminism and female fashion seems controversial.
It's not "controversial", it's stupid, wrong, sexist, bigoted, misogynistic and primitive.

I always found that radical feminism and tomboyish female fashion are destructive and divisive. I feel that female fashion going masculine is going out of hand.
Since when the fuck are tight, form fitting pants and shirts showing off cleavage masculine? Your idea of "masculinity" is severely messed up.

Just do not expect me to fall in love. I will clear this situation one day. Dusk has threatened me with a ban and has advocated female superiority, which is wrong.
Dusk can't do shit, he's a newbie. Allow me to copy an excerpt from your bio again:

Tedius Zanarukando (born on November 8, 1979), is a Tennessean-South Carolinian erotophobic hardcore video game player, a cultural critic, media proponent and free speech activist, antifeminist (especially against radical feminism), a politically independent masculist, a family dissident, an anti-censorship person, an antifundamentalist, crossdresser, and a pro-beauty person.
Hypocritical much? So it's okay for you, a male, to dress like a woman but it's not okay for women to dress like men? GTFO.

*EDIT*

There are sources to back up my opinion on this topic. I can show it to you if you ask.

Are you fucking blind? We've BEEN asking.
 
Female fashoin that displeases me has been promoted by social pressure and the media, including the Internet, television, and magazines. Many women have been deceived into such fashion. It is not recommended to disagree with me on feminism or female fashion, and my opinion is strongly held in this case.

Wait, what fashion are you talking about now? The women I see in magazines wear really small clothes and are very skinny/air brushed. Doesn't this fit how you want women to dress?

This thread is quite laughable XD. Guys, don't get worked up over Tedius. All of his posts in this thread are so ridiculous that they are quite laughable. XD
 
Well no shit, sherlock. What gave you that idea?

It's not "controversial", it's stupid, wrong, sexist, bigoted, misogynistic and primitive.

Since when the fuck are tight, form fitting pants and shirts showing off cleavage masculine? Your idea of "masculinity" is severely messed up.

Dusk can't do shit, he's a newbie. Allow me to copy an excerpt from your bio again:

Hypocritical much? So it's okay for you, a male, to dress like a woman but it's not okay for women to dress like men? GTFO.

*EDIT*



Are you fucking blind? We've BEEN asking.

No, your views are feminism and female fashion are factually wrong, anachronistic, and a thing of the 20th century. Feminism is no longer relevant today. Gender equality is impossible due to different social expectations. It is not okay for either sex to be fashioned after the opposite sex.
 
No, your views are feminism and female fashion are factually wrong, anachronistic, and a thing of the 20th century. Feminism is no longer relevant today. Gender equality is impossible due to different social expectations. It is not okay for either sex to be fashioned after the opposite sex.

Then why the hell are you a crossdresser?

And I can't help but notice you continually fail to give sources to back up your ludicrous opinions. Not that it particularly matters, because your views are wrong. You say MY views are wrong? Then why don't you try PROVING it for once instead of repeating the same stupid opinions over and over? You fail at debating.
 
Female fashoin that displeases me has been promoted by social pressure and the media, including the Internet, television, and magazines. Many women have been deceived into such fashion.
Alternatively, they formed their own thoughts on the fashion and decided that they wanted to follow it. Silly me, though, that'd mean they'd have to have an equal level of thinking capacity. Slap my bee-hind.

It is not recommended to disagree with me on feminism or female fashion, and my opinion is strongly held in this case.
We'll disagree as much as we like as long as you continue to post in such a ridiculous fashion. Irony +1, in reference to the cross-dressing.

There are sources to back up my opinion on this topic. I can show it to you if you ask.
I can only assume you've totally missed all of my posts. Yes, we want to see this evidence - but it better not be more 'articles' posted by your biased comrades.

I am not outright opposed to female employment.
Sugar-coating is a pile of fail and you know it.

I find that women are different from men. The majority disagreeing with me does not mean that I should be banned.
I don't particularly think that you should be banned - I do, however, think you need to stay away from any topic requiring an input of opinion. That narrows it down, greatly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top