Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At the end of the day, it's just an internet forum and, frankly, it's not something that should have enough drama within it to go on and accuse members of staff of being prejudiced towards a particular user.And I completely understand where you are coming from Faith, but realistically if you were on our side, if someone gets banned and they still do argue out their case in this District Prison, how are we to know if (for example) they were prejudiced against in the prison? Unless we kept in contact with the member through means outside of the forum how else would we know how the member was treated?
This tells me that you actually haven't read the rules and guidelines, particularly of the Library Headquarters. It says, quite clearly, that users can make complaints about a member of staff, but in the correct fashion. I quite appreciate how you're posting, ShinRa, and it's the kind of post that would be acceptable. When you get people who attack staff, in any shape or form, that is deemed as unaccaptable and you are punished accordingly.Also, if for example we wanted to make a complaint about a mod, how would we go about doing so, and would the complaint be treated fairly or would we suffer prejudice for utilising our power of free speech.
And as I said before, the member can post in Prison and put forward their case. The length of time is just a standard length that we have been instructed to instigate. Depending on how the banned member acts in prison, he is judged accordingly.But two years is an incredibly long time. It's essentially a perminent ban, because realistically if someone gets banned for that amount of time, more than likely they're not going to count down the days until they're allowed back onto the forum you know? If they're banned for that length of time, they're not going to come back and if for example they do come back after that time, more than likely no one will remember them.
And this fashion of posting is much more appreciated.I'm only posting about possibilities, I'm not trying to attack anyone or any system in case, i just want to make my thoughts known.
Look, the staff doesn't insult anyone, not even members.
Lady Aerith said:This thread is completely pointless and utterly retarted
Lady Aerith said:I have a husband to seduce me if I want to be seduced. You see, unlike you people, I actually GET the real thing, every night and anytime I want. I don't have to stoop so low as to come on a fucking internet forum to get laid.
Take whatever perception you want from it - it doesn't mean that he was able to publicly argue and antagonise her. There is a statement in the guidelines that you should not argue publically, but you can take things to PM and discuss things. Of course, the "correct fashion" of posting still counts.It was indirectly implied that members were 'retarded' and that we were stooping low.
Originally Posted by Lady Aerith
I have a husband to seduce me if I want to be seduced. You see, unlike you people, I actually GET the real thing, every night and anytime I want. I don't have to stoop so low as to come on a fucking internet forum to get laid.
Originall posted by Dark Tifa :
Now Rufus, cut her some slack, she's probably just jealous that no one wants to seduce her.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. What LA said was right. It was pathetic after all since it had no proper purpose after all. The member was banned and now he is being dealt with, so there's nothing to worry about.That strikes me as being provocation. It also contradicts the rules that were previously enforced (bad language).
It was indirectly implied that members were 'retarded' and that we were stooping low.
Even if that is taken in light spirit, and we 'retaliate' and say "No we're not 'retarded'", it could be argued that the wrath of the mod COULD be incurred.
At the end of the day, it's just an internet forum and, frankly, it's not something that should have enough drama within it to go on and accuse members of staff of being prejudiced towards a particular user.
This tells me that you actually haven't read the rules and guidelines, particularly of the Library Headquarters. It says, quite clearly, that users can make complaints about a member of staff, but in the correct fashion. I quite appreciate how you're posting, ShinRa, and it's the kind of post that would be acceptable. When you get people who attack staff, in any shape or form, that is deemed as unaccaptable and you are punished accordingly.
And as I said before, the member can post in Prison and put forward their case. The length of time is just a standard length that we have been instructed to instigate. Depending on how the banned member acts in prison, he is judged accordingly.
And this fashion of posting is much more appreciated.
Guys, in the end, the staff are the ones who decide what goes on. While we try to do whatever we can to listen to everyone, it's just not possible all the time. We appreciate your opinions and they are always considered, but the staff have the final say. I'm sorry, but if it's not acceptable enough for certain members, they know where the "log out" button is.
And I assure you, the same can be said for the events of the District Prison.First of all, i just want to say thank you for hearing my thoughts out and treating me with respect. I really appreciate the time and effort (and i know i'm being slightly annoying. Sorry)
To be honest, I didn't read them until I had to re-write themHaha, i'm busted! I haven't read the rules (i was gonna get around to it! Really! Hehe).
I quite agree. If you PM Zadank, I'm sure he'd quote my post to you, which shows that I am certainly in consideration of allowing him back.I agree, making an attack on a mod isn't appropriate and by all means it should be confronted. But instead of jumping to the extreme punishment stages, you could always politely retaliate (i.e. not insult them) and debate it out instead of immediately jumping to the guns. Some situations (imo) need not be confronted.
You've pretty much guessed it. Rocket science, it is not xDWell at least you keep the final fantasy side of the site anyway. Forgive my ignorance but what are the possible remedies to the district prison scenario? Is it a shortened ban? Release? Overall Ban or still put on suspension with another 'hearing'.
Riku said:Take whatever perception you want from it - it doesn't mean that he was able to publicly argue and antagonise her. There is a statement in the guidelines that you should not argue publically, but you can take things to PM and discuss things.
Aeris Gainsborough said:Shinra in fairness to Lady Aerith - someone majorly flamed her first about the whole seducing thing which is why she retaliated the way she did - after all shes only human and its a natural reaction - if someone attacks your character you defend yourself.
And since this quote was what she was replying too i dont think she was out of line at all :
Faith said:Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. What LA said was right. It was pathetic after all since it had no proper purpose after all. The member was banned and now he is being dealt with, so there's nothing to worry about.
Aztec Triogal said:But don't harp on Lady Aerith. I know she posted earlier that it was only her and a few other people really helping out around here... but honestly, even though BustaMo is my best friend since childhood, no one puts more into these forums than her. I know a lot of the mods do a lot behind the scenes but she really is the best moderator we have, bar none.
Aztec Triogal said:Those quotes are a little harsh but they're definitely taken out of context. She's a good mod and a good person. She can be harsh... but only to people who deserve it. And I can say that even though she's had to slap my hands on occassion. I fully support her. I don't think I've ever seen a better mod in all my years on various forums... and that includes me when I was a mod on many other forums.
Quite right that it had no proper purpose. Fair game, it is, but there should have been no flaming or spam whatsoever.
Messing around spam is fine, but ... stupid, idiotic spam is out of the picture. I don't just mean posts either, I'm talking about images and stuff, too.Eh? no Spam in the designated Spam forum?
Speaking of spam, I think the topic has been severely de-railed, from a gathering of opinions to criticism of protocol
As a way of trying to stanch the off-topic banter, I can say that Zidank will, most likely, be given his second chance [it all depends on the few moderators who have yet to post in his thread].
Messing around spam is fine, but ... stupid, idiotic spam is out of the picture. I don't just mean posts either, I'm talking about images and stuff, too.