I <3 Irony.

Status
Not open for further replies.
wild animals. not domesticated animals. will they ban sharks, bears, lions, tigers.

will they ban peanuts because of that guy who went into a cinema and murdered 15 people by choking to death on a peanut.
 
Alex Mason said:
http://www.centurycouncil.org/drunk-driving/drunk-driving-fatalities-national-statistics

http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
Click to expand...

Maybe we should do something like emphasize enforcing drunk driving laws and socially stigmatize those who drink and drive in an effort to lower drunk driving deaths by, say, 350% over the last thirty years?

In other words, regulate drunk drivers?

Just like you could.... regulate gun owners?

Or does that make too much sense?
 
Alex Mason said:
it makes perfect sense! regulate and create laws so the criminals will magically start following them! i wonder if there'll be a magic spell involved!
Click to expand...

Again, then why have any laws at all? If the fact that a law may or may not be broken invalidates the necessity of said law, we should have no laws whatsoever.
 
just do not use the inanimate objects incorrectly.

god wants you americans to have your guns. he insists that you need fully automatic assault weapons in order to defend your homes.
 
Nate Dogg was a damn fine regulator and look where that got him
 
Criminals who are not afraid to go to prison wont follow the laws but normal every day citizens who do not enjoy the idea of going to prison for owning a gun means they will not own a gun which means that there will be less guns and less accidental shootings and it will be harder for criminals to get guns which means more than likely murders and things will happen less. Why is this so hard for people to understand?

less guns and less murder = a good thing
 
How many people these days actually hunt for their food anymore anyway haha I mean really?
 
we already know there are plenty of people killing their dears. that only adds to the problem.

deer on the other hand. i heard they are tasty.
 
Squidward said:
How many people these days actually hunt for their food anymore anyway haha I mean really?
Click to expand...

Most people hunt for sport and then choose to keep the meat. Very very few actually hunt as a means of survival. But then that's a liberal talking so I'm obviously wrong.
 
Squidward said:
Criminals who are not afraid to go to prison wont follow the laws but normal every day citizens who do not enjoy the idea of going to prison for owning a gun means they will not own a gun which means that there will be less guns and less accidental shootings and it will be harder for criminals to get guns which means more than likely murders and things will happen less. Why is this so hard for people to understand?

less guns and less murder = a good thing
Click to expand...

It seems simple, but you have to take into account how many people will revolt.
 
I highly doubt that too many americans hunt and gut their own meat. You can easily buy organic stuff in the shops anyway.
I get if you live like far away from shops and stuff in the middle of the woop woop but seriously.
 
i would argue that its a bit selfish to say you need assault weapons for hunting.

its even more selfish to say you'd rather have the ability to hunt for your own meat cause of "chemicals and stuff" and the expense of multiple gun massacres every year. you do not need assault weapons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top