I realized that when I thought of the Final Fantasy XIII cutscenes, that I thought of them as being flashy and graphical. There is some message behind the cutscenes and story, but all you notice is the graphics being better than a lot of other games.
So I'm wondering if in a few years, when the graphics are looked at as average, if Final Fantasy XIII may be looked at as a better game because it's easier to notice the other points it might contain (besides graphics). This theory kind of goes against common knowledge, but the actuality of reality can be rather strange sometimes.
For example, I'm pretty sure that X was once looked at as a beautiful game. Some still consider it beautiful, but it's kind of delusional to say it has the best graphics (unless you are limited to a PS2 system). However I think the perception of the game is about as high as it was when it was new, and yet the perception of the actual game is kind of higher in a way because the high perceptions people have now are probably less based on graphics than they were when X was new, because people were basing their perception of the game on X having some of the best graphics and "advancements" at the time.
One of the complaints about XIII is that too much focus was on the game having good graphics and being advanced. But in a few years, there's little reason to have that resentment over this game. In a way, XIII reminds me of VI (as a game)... of course it isn't as good, because VI is a classic, but this kind of brings me back to the same point. About the only problem I see in XIII in comparison to classic Final Fantasy games, is that the pacing of the game can be a little slow... and the battles, perhaps a bit hard to follow.
So I'm wondering if in a few years, when the graphics are looked at as average, if Final Fantasy XIII may be looked at as a better game because it's easier to notice the other points it might contain (besides graphics). This theory kind of goes against common knowledge, but the actuality of reality can be rather strange sometimes.
For example, I'm pretty sure that X was once looked at as a beautiful game. Some still consider it beautiful, but it's kind of delusional to say it has the best graphics (unless you are limited to a PS2 system). However I think the perception of the game is about as high as it was when it was new, and yet the perception of the actual game is kind of higher in a way because the high perceptions people have now are probably less based on graphics than they were when X was new, because people were basing their perception of the game on X having some of the best graphics and "advancements" at the time.
One of the complaints about XIII is that too much focus was on the game having good graphics and being advanced. But in a few years, there's little reason to have that resentment over this game. In a way, XIII reminds me of VI (as a game)... of course it isn't as good, because VI is a classic, but this kind of brings me back to the same point. About the only problem I see in XIII in comparison to classic Final Fantasy games, is that the pacing of the game can be a little slow... and the battles, perhaps a bit hard to follow.