Now, as much as I do enjoy playing xbox or playstation at friends' houses, I can't help but feel as though they are completely pointless consoles...
Now, the reason I believe that playstation and xbox are completely pointless gimmicks (so I guess there IS a point, $$$), is that to my knowledge every game available to play on Xbox, playstation, whatever console, is originally made on the computer (or at least most of them), which means that every game (even the xbox or playstation exclusive ones) could simply just be released for PC, and everyone could at this point be used to gaming on the PC. So basically, the xbox and playstation were created simply so that gamers can spend their money buying a new xbox (im just gonna say xbox from hereon out) and $70 games for it, as opposed to just upgrade their PC.
Questions (Have to read in order to reply properly)
So firstly, my question is, who here agrees that while non PC consoles are maybe useful for those without computer experience, and also fun to play, they are overall unnecessary (I like to think of them as appendages torn from the computer and sold at an inconvenient price)
Next part, is that when playing with my friends on their consoles, we often discuss the difference between Xbox and PS3 (don't worry, that's not what this is about). During these discussions, it almost always occurs that the topic of PC gaming slips it's way in (usually caused by me), and what I usually end up having to hear is that "Well yeah, it's sick that you play your games on a system which allows you to play games AND go online easily, watch videos, etc... (not that xbox and ps3 don't let you these days, but not as efficiently), but the PC Community is dying, compared to the way that Xbox and PS3 are thriving"
I wouldn't say that the 360 and PS3 are pointless. The PS3 itself is basically a media station, as it can be a stand alone blue ray player, and it has the connection to the internet itself. The 360 has a great Live system imo, allowing gamers to mark their achievement and what not.
Spending 70 or so dollars on a game is fine, considering ever so often (couple of years) you should upgrade your computer's video card and/or ram to be able to keep up with the ever progressing technology in PC gaming. I do agree that PC's will always be better graphically than consoles, since they are much more upgradeable.
Speaking from a ps2 reference, as I don't have a PS3 or 360 (I'll never own a 360, PS fanboy here), but games are rarely released for the PC first, if ever. Now the next gen consoles are sharing more and more titles with the PC, but that's mainly for the fans that only want to stick to one gaming platform. It's more of a mass money market than it is exclusivity of the games.
I also don't think the consoles are ideas that were ripped away from PC's, but that they provide other options for people who don't want to constantly upgrade their computer. I also don't think PC gaming is dieing. Games like the new Star Wars MMO and Diablo 3 and Starcraft 2. Granted, those are all MMO's and Strategy games, but they have their shooters and racers as well.
I used to play World of Warcraft all the time, and still play Stracraft and Diablo 2 a lot. PC gaming isn't dead at all, people will always have their favorites.
sorry my response couldn't be bigger. I'm on my PS3 XD
^epic quote.