I steadfast believe that Arsenal will win the Premiership this season. Does that mean that this is a religion?Confucianism is considered a religion. And it is nothing more than a steadfast belief in the philosophies of a single man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I steadfast believe that Arsenal will win the Premiership this season. Does that mean that this is a religion?Confucianism is considered a religion. And it is nothing more than a steadfast belief in the philosophies of a single man.
Your request is flawed.God does exist.
Prove me wrong, without the use of science and circular logic.
Ironic.This is meant for serious discussion. Please post more than one-liners...
First of all, no human can ever PROVE anything. The best we could ever hope to do is create an educated guess. There will always be an unknown element, be it God or otherwise, that will allow a secondary "reason" as to why things happen, or why things are, that will always act against the original proof, therefore leaving the "proof" unproven until the secondary "reason" is PROVED to be an incorrect hypothesis. Even if God poked his head from the clouds and said "I CREATED MAN," we still wouldn't have "proved" anything. We don't have to believe a giant head in the clouds, after all, he could be lying. Even if he showed us a recording of him creating us, we could still doubt it ("Obvious shop is obvious").Anyways...
This 'Prove or Disprove' god crap that everyone debates over is stupid.
You cannot prove someone exists simply by rationalization. Okay, you haven't seen miracles, and a lot of the stuff in the bible is unclear or BS. That doesn't mean he's not existant. And, sure. There is an unknown cause behind the big bang, and there's other unexplainable things in this world. That doesn't mean an intelligent being was behind it.
In short, debate will __never__ have a conclusion.
So... I have a new question. Why do you all continue with these pointless topics? =\
Science IS logic, by the way. By denying science to be used as an argument, you're basically locking away all possible argument and setting this thread up for your half of the argument to win.
Really has nothing to do with what I just said, but eh, whatever...Yes, but typically, atheists either believe science created the universe or nothing did, which is a lot harder for me to believe than a supernatural being creating it.
Enjoyment? From something that gets you nowhere? Eh... Suppose I can live with that answer. Thats what video games are, after all, unless you're the ones involved in their tournaments or their creation.So, why debate if no one person can ever be proven correct? Well, to expand our minds and try to get closer to actually "proving" something. Although we will never reach our goal of actually "proving" something doesn't mean we don't enjoy trying.
In the beginning (lawl), there was pretty much nothing but random gases (cba to name them all, stfu) in the 'universe'. That's a loosely used term, since technically there wasn't a universe at the time. But it makes things easier.I'm just saying... What was the big bang? How did it start?
The gas just was. It didn't come from anywhere, it just was there. It's a hard notion to get your head around, but also try thinking about what the universe is expanding into. The answer is that it isn't; it's just expanding.
Gravity isn't that much of a mystery... Everything physical has gravity... I believe I've been able to see a bit of my own gravity when I was bored, by noticing how light and color bend just slightly around my arm.Stole the words right out of my mouth... =P
What he says is true. Things simply are... They don't need a cause. It's like asking why there's gravity, air resistance, and other things of that nature... It simply is.