Who thinks they could beat me in an argument?

That was your argument? Prepare to be extinguished.

You are Pieman, or so we, your follow members, are led to believe. From where this Pieman superhero aspect has arisen, I do not know.

For someone to be cool, he has to be liked. You are under the impression that everyone on these forums hate you (as you have directly stated, you cannot back out of that fact). So, this results in a superhero, you, who is not liked. If you are not liked, Pieman is not liked. If Pieman is not liked, he therefore cannot possibly "pwn" (which you have yet to define, by the way)/

I think that should round off my argument for now ;) Feel free to reply ... in vain.
 
With the name pieman, I was using the name of the character, but I wasn't saying that I was him. Just like you aren't saying you are The Sephiroth Gene. So that means even if I say I am hated, Pieman is still cool. He still pwns.
 
If Pieman in fact does "pwn", then why did you care so much as to the alleged teasing you were receiving from the other members. I believe you said the name was getting "boring" (;)). If he was so cool, why did it bother you so much as to what others thought of him? Surely, if he really did "pwn", then there would be no dubious feelings for your name.

The argument, summarised, is this:
You think pieman pwns, I have proven otherwise twice.

Looks like the argument is in my favour ;) However, as my rules clearly stated, to win, you must actually give up.
 
I did get bored, mainly because I wanted people to stop saying I am him. I am not pieman, so I don't want to be called him.
 
Now that is something I'd really like to see. However, wouldn't arguments necessarily need a bias for each side? Could it be possible that you have a set opinion on everything? That would be like freakin' amazing.
*steps up to the podium* I hereby proclaim myself to be the single most opinionated human being on the planet. Sephiroth and Dragonsoul can probably attest to the truth of that one. :cool:

Now, before I actually bother to ask anything, do you actually want a serious topic to discuss? :P
 
Well...if I knew every single person on the planet, I might be able to judge if you are the most opinionated human being on the planet. But I can say that you're the most opinionated human being that I know.
 
I think being opinionated and argumentative are a good combination to have in humans. Do you agree with this? If not, then we have our next topic ;)

We have our basis for a decent argument ;) I'm looking forward to this.

As you are the challenger, I will allow you to go first. Similar rules apply to everyone argument as they did for Pieman. I will insert a set of criteria, actually, into my first post.
 
I think being opinionated and argumentative are a good combination to have in humans. Do you agree with this? If not, then we have our next topic ;)

Ah that is a tricky question. True they are good qualitys you don't want some one who doesnt think for themselves or can not back up there opinions with reasonable topics, but people can go overboard with their arguing, and their opinions.

Being to opinionated leads to narrow mindedness and ignorance. while not being at least a little opinionated means you have no opinions or principle of your own.

And one doesn't want to be to argumentative otherwise eventually people will begin to stop listening to your arguments because they have to hear them everyday.
 
Last edited:
Ah that is a tricky question. True they are good qualitys you don't want some one who doesnt think for themselves or can not back up there opinions with reasonable topics, but people can go overboard with their arguing, and their opinions.

Being to opinionated leads to narrow mindedness and ignorance. while not being at least a little opinionated means you have no opinions or principle of your own.

And one doesn't want to be to argumentative otherwise eventually people will begin to stop listening to your arguments because they have to hear them everyday.

I hate to be the bitch here, but myself and Sephiroth were going to go for this one, we've been trying since the beginning, I'd hate to miss out on this one ;)
 
Being to opinionated leads to narrow mindedness and ignorance. while not being at least a little opinionated means you have no opinions or principle of your own.
I disagree. Being strongly opinionated means that you have your opinions set on many things, and you hold to them steadfast. Stubborness doesn't automatically mean stupidity.

Narrow mindedness and ignorance don't even come into the equation - they will exist or not, regardless of how opinionated a person is. I consider myself opinionated, but those opinions on founded on my own insatiable thirst for knowledge and understanding of things, and years of introspective and subjective thinking and analysis. My brain is constantly churning through information, constantly.

I assure you, I am far from ignorant; of course, you only have my word to go on with that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top