Who thinks they could beat me in an argument?

Davey Gaga

Davey Gaga

Under you like a G.U.Y.
Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
7,134
Age
33
Location
Glasgow City Centre, Scotland.
Gil
0
I challenge all members on FFF to argue with me on anything - it could be as complicated as the meaning of life, to as simple as food taste.

If you begin an argument with me, you only win when I back out, or run out of things to say (which will be never btw ;)).

You lose when you back out, or end up foolishly repeating things that make no sense.

Follow that?

Begin :)

__________________

RULES (Preferably, meet all of them)
  • Regular forum rules still apply (No flaming, advertising, etc)
  • Give your side of the argument
  • State why you are with this side
  • Give your argument (the main part - what you think)
  • Conclude
  • Prepare to lose
_______________

SCORE
Dave: 1
FFF: 0
 
hmmmmmm....... I got one.

argueing about food is good. I love pie so that's a good thing to argue about.
 
I'd love to challenge you, but what is there that we disagree on enough that we can even debate?

It seems we agree on science and religion, morality in general, etc.

And I don't have much of an opinion on food or other things more trivial.

Unless either of us wants to play devil's advocate...
 
The Sephiroth Gene said:
I challenge all members on FFF to argue with me on anything - it could be as complicated as the meaning of life, to as simple as food taste.
Click to expand...

Now that is something I'd really like to see. However, wouldn't arguments necessarily need a bias for each side? Could it be possible that you have a set opinion on everything? That would be like freakin' amazing.
 
I hadn't thought of this problem :P

Hmm ... how about a member chooses something they thing may be ... debateable, or simply baby-ish :P

For example: I think Irn Bru is the best drink ever :P
You think Coca-Cola is the best drink ever :P

Let's begin? lol

(I wouldn't actually argue with that, because that's just silly, but you get the idea. State something you believe in strongly and will fight for to the end)>

Angelus, I look forward to your challenge ;)
 
You think Pieman is stupid and spammish

I think otherwise.

You go first in this.
 
Well, not exactly. It's because we are most likely in an agreement over them. We both agree to being agnostic/atheism, have similar views on Christianity, and I can't see too much of a benefit for arguing agnosticism over atheism. It goes without saying that we both give science credit as well, and a logical method of thinking. So if you wanted to argue about this, one of us would have to play devil's advocate.
 
I see your point ...

How about "Scotland is the best place to in the world"?

(Nah, 'cause I know it's not ;))

Let's make it simple then. Any suggestions? Seriously, anything will do :cool:
 
So be it. Naturally, I'll be against the argument that "Pieman pwns".

You can start.
In your argument, please do the following:
  • Give YOUR definition of BOTH Pieman and the term "pwns"
  • Explain your reason WHY you think Pieman "pwns"
  • Conclude your argument
  • Prepare to lose
:) Begin ;)
 
You do not know that pieman doesn't pwn because a pie superhero is the coolest one ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top