The_Oathkeeper
Why so serious?
I really don't see how Amano's art is preferrable to Nomura's original works. Don't get me wrong, Amano has an interesting style, to say the least, but once you take away the rose-tinted glass provided by nostalgia, you'll see that it amounts to nothing more than colored chicken-scratch (put cruelly for sake of getting my point across). It certainly isn't superior to the refined, colorful designs found in Final Fantasy 7 or 8. Don't get me wrong, here, the characters themselves are creative, but I simply don't know how Amano's art style is better than Nomura's original style.
Besides, I don't see how it's a bad thing that Nomura's style resembles anime. Back in the days of Final Fantasy 7 and 8, he was churning out some genuinely high-quality character designs. The fact that they were visibly reminiscent of anime characters certainly didn't take away from their "epicness", and I've found that those who think so are typically blinded by nostalgia. Not that that's their fault or anything...I mean, it happens to the best of us, myself included. Honestly, though, male Final Fantasy characters were always designed with Bishounen qualities in-mind. Cecil wears lipstick, uses a sword, and has white hair, for Flying Spaghetti Monster's sake! If that doesn't scream "Generic Anime Bishounen", I don't know what does. To say that Nomura started this trend is inaccurate. The only reason you didn't see it before was because Amano's art style lacked detail.
Now, I'm not trying to bash Amano or defend Nomura. However, to say that Amano's art style is superior to Nomura's simply because Nomura uses "anime" art is a bit foolish. Back before Nomura got a raging boner for Gackt and a bizarre belt/zipper fetish, he brought about a number of incredible character designs, as did Amano. It's only once Advent Children and FFX came around that Nomura decided that 12+ belts combined with leather made for a good character design. Both artists have (or, in Nomura's case, had) very distinctive styles and really brought a lot to the table when it came to RPG characters. I don't really consider either one superior to the other, simply because of how different their styles of art are, but to put Nomura down solely because he draws his characters in an anime-like style is borderline ridiculous.
Though I most certainly will not defend modern-day Nomura, who probably couldn't bring about a decent character design to save his life...*cough* Belts, zippers, and leather thrown randomly onto the body of a generic J-Rock star do not make for a good character design.
Of course, art is entirely objective...it also isn't my forte. Everything I just said has a high chance of being wrong, in fact. I'm basically just going by my personal preference, so...
Besides, I don't see how it's a bad thing that Nomura's style resembles anime. Back in the days of Final Fantasy 7 and 8, he was churning out some genuinely high-quality character designs. The fact that they were visibly reminiscent of anime characters certainly didn't take away from their "epicness", and I've found that those who think so are typically blinded by nostalgia. Not that that's their fault or anything...I mean, it happens to the best of us, myself included. Honestly, though, male Final Fantasy characters were always designed with Bishounen qualities in-mind. Cecil wears lipstick, uses a sword, and has white hair, for Flying Spaghetti Monster's sake! If that doesn't scream "Generic Anime Bishounen", I don't know what does. To say that Nomura started this trend is inaccurate. The only reason you didn't see it before was because Amano's art style lacked detail.
Now, I'm not trying to bash Amano or defend Nomura. However, to say that Amano's art style is superior to Nomura's simply because Nomura uses "anime" art is a bit foolish. Back before Nomura got a raging boner for Gackt and a bizarre belt/zipper fetish, he brought about a number of incredible character designs, as did Amano. It's only once Advent Children and FFX came around that Nomura decided that 12+ belts combined with leather made for a good character design. Both artists have (or, in Nomura's case, had) very distinctive styles and really brought a lot to the table when it came to RPG characters. I don't really consider either one superior to the other, simply because of how different their styles of art are, but to put Nomura down solely because he draws his characters in an anime-like style is borderline ridiculous.
Though I most certainly will not defend modern-day Nomura, who probably couldn't bring about a decent character design to save his life...*cough* Belts, zippers, and leather thrown randomly onto the body of a generic J-Rock star do not make for a good character design.
Of course, art is entirely objective...it also isn't my forte. Everything I just said has a high chance of being wrong, in fact. I'm basically just going by my personal preference, so...