pooley

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marquis of Granby

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
1,355
Gil
0
i went with the canon 1.4.

i'm somewhere between thinking "what have i done?" and "this better be ace or i will kneecap pooley".
 
you are. if you cant trust a diabetic who the fuck can you trust?

i just had a night out with a client even though i'm technically still on holiday.

FUCKING DEDICATION.

(that's my justification for buying the lens)
 
my mate who i work with quite often has a 1.4 and i always try to use his rather than my 1.8 if i can. there's not much difference in performance, but the 1.4 is just nicer to use.

also, what kind of client are we talking about?
 
a engineering client from norway.

i am not a prostitute.

i will take this as you saying the 1.4 is better in every way and it will make me ejaculate in my panties.
 
ejaculation not guaranteed. but it is better in pretty much every way that matters. of course, i'm speaking as a camera operator, and not a photographer.

did you get to make a deal with mr engineering client?
 
is that the kit?

fucking...fuck. i've decided i don't like zooms anymore. primes are much simpler and jesus likes primes much more than he liks a zoom.
 
it's almost hard to argue with something like the 24-105 because (at least on a full frame) it covers super handy focal ranges. aside from the fact that i dont doubt it's a fucking awesome lens i'm (at least for now) not really into the telephoto range yet. i've mainly been using my lensbaby (basically a 50mm on my camera) and that fd 50mm 1.8 (80mm on my camera). i just prefer using my legs to zoom in and out now. plus i'm a fan of that wide aperature.

I LOVE DE BOKEH
 
it does depend on what your needs are i suppose. a long zoom like that comes in handy a lot of the time for me, but i don't think i'd ever buy another one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top