Hmmmm I Wonder

KR Skull

KR Skull

Blue Mage
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
148
Age
39
Gil
0
ok i know that some of you will say this person is strange like what Mr.innuendo when he thought that i put little kids in cage or when i talked about fake ID and some other stuff. to tell you the truth i was surprised when i saw all that and then i thought about it and remembered a quote i heared long time ago " it's not like i can't see. i've got one good eye. and i can see part of the truthby letting my heart leads my fingers."

so the question is: is it something good to let your heart lead your fingers?
 
It's actually good to write so people can understand what you are saying.
Your heart leading your fingers you say?
Do you mean is it better to think with your brain than with your heart?

You have to explain yourself, as no one else can understand what you have said.
 
You can see certain things if you let your brain do the work, and other things you seem to be able to see if you let your heart do the work. Of these things that you can see, I think that the things that your brain allows you to see more closely reflects reality, and therefore, true revelation and truth, and the things that your heart leads you to see may not be considered rational, even if you "feel" it.

Therefore, it is not necessarily good to let your feelings get away with everything. It only feels good, but whether or not it really is good cannot be guaranteed.
 
Karl Friedrich Gauß said:
I think that the things that your brain allows you to see more closely reflects reality, and therefore, true revelation and truth, and the things that your heart leads you to see may not be considered rational, even if you "feel" it.
Click to expand...

i don't agree with you about that part becuse most womans let there heart leads them all the time and now look where thay are. for example helen killer. she couldn't see and hear so she let her heart lead her and look where she is now. she has becam famous and some people made her there mentor.
 
old snake said:
i don't agree with you about that part becuse most womans let there heart leads them all the time and now look where thay are. for example helen killer. she couldn't see and hear so she let her heart lead her and look where she is now. she has becam famous and some people made her there mentor.
Click to expand...
Isn't that just a little sexist?
I'll answer my own question. Yes.

Contrary to your beliefs, wimminz are as capable of rational thought as men:gasp:

I think there are advantages to both. As Angelus says, if you use your brain you make rational objective decisions and are less likely to make mistakes etc.
However, sometimes not thinking can be just as good. That girl in your class that you like, she is waaaaay too good for you right. Therefore you think rationally and dismiss her from your mind. Or, you just ask her out, and you both live happily ever after.
Constantly being rational is not really human, it's robotic. Which may suit some people. I'd say that for most people, a mixture of the two would be best.
It's hard to say that one is better than the other.
 
when someone have a gut about something doesn't that means that his heart is telling him something? like you know when someone talks to you. you have a gut that he is hiding something from you?
 
Ahhh... the rough divide of using head and heart. Head alone makes us robotic. Without emotions and with just pure rationality we cannot be human. With just the heart, raw emotion is flawed and while natural, is unjustified. The best outcome would be from the union of both. Feel with your heart, think with your head. True emotion processed through solid reason will lead to the right decisions. If you know it in your head and know it in your heart, then you're damned well to know what you're doing is right.
 
But you can know whether or not they're hiding something from you logically. You can tell by their tone, or the way they look or act--that's actually what's telling you they're hiding something. Otherwise, you have no proof that they are hiding something from you.
 
but what about the cold hearted people or what most people call them the none emotion person. the things you said said can not be seen in them. there faces don't change and there tone is one when thay are sad, happy, mad.
 
right right, how can you really tell what one is thinking especially if that guy is a poker face or sumthin'. Some people actually have like this sixth sense wherein they can feel auras. Some people can actually feel that there is something going on because according to scientists, the brain emits brainwaves. Some of us have the skill of feeling these waves better than the other. Sometimes I get this feeling too, I know what someone is thinking for no reason, I just feel it.
 
And their "sixth" senses can be wrong. It's nothing more than mere intuition, and last I checked, intuition never guaranteed anything. What I'm saying is that there is a rational way of verifying if someone is hiding from you or not. You don't have to assume that anything someone says is necessarily true, and physical evidences and other research can verify your claims. You can use this information to prove that someone is hiding something from you. A mere "brainwave", which might, in some cases, be nothing more than a mere placebo effect could be a mishap.
 
Intuition, irrationality, always some explanation, maybe. Though you might not at first be able to explain love, there are chemicals which the sensation and bond can be attributed to. It's all very complicated, no doubt. Emotions are not unique to humans, but we are the only ones who can override those instincts, as far as I'm aware of, with a few exceptions, maybe, of our closest relatives in the animal kingdom, rarely. The lines become blurry for human-level sentience.
Such things as human emotions, and the ability to process them, are a part of what makes us "human", in many ways. Though we would not be able to survive if we simply put pure emotion before logic, most, if not all, people are, ultimately, emotion and sensation driven. Emotions, feelings, and sensations drive all animals to do things, on varying levels. We cannot explain emotions and sensations in their raw context. We do not know precisely the nature of pain, we only know the sensation, and that stimuli and neurotransmitters make it so.

Whilst intuition may not be understood by science yet, it is unwise to automatically dismiss it, as there may be some otherwise unseen factors which are subconsciously detected.
I admit that a hunch will make me suspicious, but then I will look for evidence that justifies such. I find caution and vigilance to be the best policies.

Logical and rational study tries to make sense of the world, and provide solutions and answers to dilemmas, whilst creating new problems and questions in the process. The ultimate goals of science and logic are to explain everything. Perhaps eventually mankind will.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top