Earth: The Center of the Universe?

Zero-point energy is a very interesting concept. Every time I think about it, FFX's sphere grid oddly comes tom mind lol.
Pretty much, zero-point energy can be thought of as units of space, and they are charged by any force or energy. This is how magnetism, for example, travels through space and attracts two magnetic objects.
They are like nodes.
This also explains why some substances stay liquid at sub-zero temperatures while other melt in the palm of your hand. It's the zero-point energies within them. The effect on the nodes they travel through is their physical behavior.
I'm not sure where this stands today, as the original version of it was thought up as a mysterious substance called 'aether' that hypothetically had to exist for energy to travel through empty space-- and general relativity annihilated 'aether'.
It's something I'd check up on. Quantum mechanics is on the verge of making big things happen, but Einstein's relativity still stands suprisingly strong despite the beating it's taken recently.
 
I will Its been a while since its I had my interest in Stellar Sciences :ryan:

Bloody Women getting in the way:lew:

I was doing some study of the size of Varying particle sings at distances @ Planck lengths.
I might get back into that.

As far as I know? ZPE is one of the primary foci of the LHC?
to proof its viability as an energy source? Vacuum Energy they way of the future:ryan:
As you mentioned above/earlier about the Existence of Electrons in parallel dimensions, I dont disbelieve in the existence of other Dimensions I just dont like the pivotal role they play in String theory and supper Synnergy.

SS is it self a another thing Im wanting to study more about.
 
Last edited:
ZPE is the fundamental thing they are trying to prove, yes. But what takes they cake is the 'graviton' that is supposed to pop out when the particles collide in the collinder. If they find it, it will help unify gravity with the other forces.
Electromagnetism, I think, are the only two forces to be unified thus far. Everything comes to a dead halt when it comes to the others, especially gravity, because it's such an incredibly weak force and can't even be detected in the quantum world as of yet.
For example, just by standing up you have defied the entire Earth's pull on you. Or in relevance to other forces, a small magnet attracting a paperclip defies all of Earth's gravity.
Gravity is the asshole in all fundamental theories, pretty much. This is why the aim on unification is so dire to physicists.

One thing you have to know about string theory is that it is more or less unconventional. It's like the wild west in the sense that it goes on it's own rules. But super-symmetry is important on either side. I say go for it. I may look deeper into it myself and see if I can discover a more specific hypothesis on it.
 
To get back to the origin of this thread:
"Since there is nothing relative to all other objects in space as a whole, who's to say that the Earth isn't the center of the universe?"

It is just a matter of perspective. Earth isnt the enter of the solar system because it makes more sense to place the sun at the middle since all the other objects rotate around it.

You can claim anything is the center and start from there- this is done all the time in math when you re-center the axis to ease the inerpretation of something.
 
Back
Top