Does every object have animate influences?

[Korytco]

Does every object have animate influences? Does every and any object , is every and any object ...well can they be understood humanly and in turn be governed to an understanding based on human logic, thought, and feelings?

Once an object observed by the senses, gathered by some sort of discipline, generalized practice or human thought , balanced from confusion to understanding due to human logic, is every object relative ? Does every object obtain a more "positive" position .

Does every object create a reaction , based on already set reactions? Are the human influences notable and relevant ? Or when you think of a broom do you think of all the ways people use them , or the way that you use yours based on the teachings of others. Based on the logical pratices demonstrated by others for that item? A broom is never just a broom, a glass is never just a glass.

All objects do they an organic influence and hyponsis to them .

 

[Dean Winchester]

You really bring the strangest of topics, and you really enjoy it, don't you?

Every action has a reaction with an equal or greater force of the original action, so I guess yes, objects do make reactions.

For example, let's say you stare at a painting. The painting triggers the thoughts in your brain making you reason with yourself. You start thinking about the colors, then the designs, the style, the year it was painted, etc, etc, etc.

Does every object create a reaction , based on already set reactions? Are the human influences notable and relevant ? Or when you think of a broom do you think of all the ways people use them , or the way that you use yours based on the teachings of others. Based on the logical pratices demonstrated by others for that item? A broom is never just a broom, a glass is never just a glass.

Well no and yes, no one has the absolute answer to everything because our limited understanding of life and its elements is indeed, very limited. The usage we give to objects depends on the purpose we give it and why we made it.

Every thing is made for a reason, but sometimes I've seen people use objects for other purposes, for example, a broom used as a sword, a steel chair as a weapon, a kitchen knife as a tool for murder, etc, etc, etc.

 

[der Astronom]

They're usually only used for different purposes when you actually think about it. Most people aren't imaginative enough to consider using things for reasons other than what they're used for--except when the situation calls for it. Perhaps you've been assigned to make an art project, and ended up using some objects not meant for art as a part of art. Or as mentioned above, you use any number of household items as weapons to defend yourself. Home Alone is also a good example of this too. The objects don't get used that way until the situation calls for it.

 

[Aztec Triogal]

This is an awesome thread. Mainly because it references two major ideolic theories that are really cool, IMO. One is that everything is connected within the world. A tree, a rock, a plastic bag... they're all just a part of the world as a whole, as much as any living being would be. The second is the infamous Chaos Theory, which I just love to pieces.

My opinion is that everything is interconnected as far as chemistry is concerned. All matter is made up of the combination of different elements. All elements are determined by how many protons comprise them. So in that way, everything is interconnected... but I do not see everything interconnected in a spiritual way.

As for the Chaos Theory, which states that even the most common and insignificant action can play a major role in someone's life. It's basically simple cause and effect exaggerated to incorporate how even the tiniest of events can change the ultimate outcome of a situation. In most cases there are many causes to one effect... and I do have to say I believe in this. Not that there is any hand that guides fate, necessarily... but that a series of seemingly insignificant events can be the determining factor in a given situation if the environment is ripe for it. It's something you can never really prove but it is interesting. It's sad that the only way this theory is usually explored is through time travel, which has nothing to do with the original concept. :/