Search results

I can see your side of the argument, and I won't argue against it because these are all opinions, but don't you think it was out of place to call me flat out wrong because you disagree with me? :hmmm: I agree Cloud is stronger, I said that in my earlier post. In fact, that's not even an...

Expand, please. You say it as if it is a fact of it's own, some information is needed. Or am I wrong because potatoes grow on trees? Hating Cloud and not hating Zack means that the individual that does so would of course choose Zack over Cloud. It's simple logic. The simplest logic there is...

This opinion is strongly biased, but I'm voicing it anyway :mokken: Zack by far. The "cloud is stronger" excuse is extremely invalid, because during hojos experiments on the body, Cloud was infused with Zack cells and Jenova cells AND Sephy cells, so Cloud wouldn't be what he is without Zack...

Shouldn't it be here, then? http://www.finalfantasyforums.net/forums/329-FF-Related-Titles

Negatives to the PSP version consist of needing a Shakespearean translator and stupidly easy difficulty...They removed all sense of challenge in the PSP version. The only plus side is the multiplayer and that's only if you have a friend with a PSP and with the game, and the expansion on Beowulf...

I started maybe a couple days ago, just got Cid and the keystone, but I'm leveling some materia before I go into the temple of the ancients, specifically the time materia. I'll see what else I can level, too, maybe get regen on the way to getting stop, but that just depends on incoming AP. I...

I always rushed through getting Cid, until then I never had a concrete party because my group consists of Cid, Cloud, and Vincent. Cid is very powerful for his attack and limit breaks, so I load him with attack increasing materia such as counter, long range, and a few HP plus early in the game...

In my opinion, the leveling system left much to be desired. It was basically "Go kill things." Which I understand is what most JRPGs do, but I've always felt like that was lacking, in every final fantasy. The best summoning system in my opinion is in ten, that one was fantastic. As far as...

In terms of story and not gameplay... Women: 1: General Beatrix 2: Yuna 3: Agrias 4: Celes 5: Edea 6: Ashe 7: Dagger/Garnet 8: Quistis 9: Eiko 10: Quina. Because androgyny. Men: 1: Ramaza Beoulve. 2: Vivi 3: Vincent 4: Zidane 5: Balthier 6: Auron 7: Kefka 8: Barret 9: Reeve (cait sith) 10: Kuja

For which game? Methinks this is in the wrong section :hmm: It also depends on if you'd prefer to make the trip harder for yourself (Like I do, go into FFI without a healer, it's quite difficult at times.)

The best Final Fantasy games in my opinion are Final Fantasy IX, Final Fantasy VI, and Final Fantasy Tactics, so out of all the ones you listed, I would go for Final Fantasy VI. It had some of the best characters, the best antagonist, and one hell of a story. Personally, I like a difficult game...

Not gonna lie, totally looks like a female Sephiroth :wacky: Are you sure it's a character from Final Fantasy?

I give up. Pretty sure you're the one trolling, here, as I have tried, and I have remained consistent, and I tell the truth. You, on the other hand, for the first half of this thread have refused to supply information upon request until a mod said no more one liners. I did agree that you get an...

I give them chances, then I analyze them, then I critique them according to the information provided and my experience with said situation and/or event.If you find it belittling, it's not my fault. (^ That is a one liner in my book.) The rest of the post is riddled with so many typing and...

...Resources lose value in surplus. They become unnecessary, obsolete. DIRT for example, there's tons of it. Hundreds of tons of dirt. Your posts most certainly have been one liners, but if you fail to see this, surely you can agree they are not paragraphs. Assuming I'm trolling my way through...

Less one liners more explanation. Enough of the "not playing games", it's the number one excuse of not having anything. I pput in effort, there's actually a few responses with context, yours consist of me being stupid because I'm wrong because you disagree. Give me explanations and some real...

Again, examples requested. And no more one liners. I want to see paragraphs.

This isn't a question of whether or not the resources are there :ffs: That would be one stupid debate.

I think what he's saying is that if there is no reason to even try to manage the resources, that it feels like there's no limitation...because there isn't. Thus reducing the sense of resources. This proving both our points.

If the case was "clearly" not what it is, why would anyone disagree? It would be clear, would it not? How about this. Provide examples. All your posts consist of "You're wrong because I say so" Instead, tell me WHY I'm wrong. Or do as this thread was intended.