Recent content by Shrouded

In regards to abortion... I'm not talking about arguing, just the fact that the bill is introduced means that there are disagreements in the house of legislation am I right?

...and we're back at this again: Is it better if I just say that just fact that the bill had been introduced is in direct conflict of the Roe V Wade ruling? That there are "disagreements" in the house of legislation simply because of that bill?---Me Do you still remember that? Keyword btw is...

So, there's a disagreement in the Legislative Branch huh?

.....and I have no problem with you going by implications.Anything else to add? So am I wrong when I say that Republicans and Democrats are just one big whole happy bipartisan family when it comes to abortion?

Chips Anyone ever tell you how nitpicky you are? I just feel like calling them child/unborn child. I know it's not technically right, but I like to treat them like human beings. Is that all right with you? Ok, I'm not making assumptions on what's going to happen. That's in the future, I'm not...

(.....) Oookkkkaaaayy then, we both agree that the child is alive and I'm pretty sure there's no argument that the child is human....Anything else that you'd like to add? Is it better if I just say that just fact that the bill had been introduced is in direct conflict of the Roe V Wade...

You do know I was agreeing with you right? In my debate with Chips, I was criticising the US Legislative Branch.

I'm guessing this was a different CassinnoChips that posted this at page 35: Nowhere in those foot/endnotes did I see the word "life." Nowhere did it explicitly state "life begins at this point." It only says "development" or a "unique individual" or some other, highly interpretive phrase that...

Mehaha *sigh* I remember you saying that a couple pages ago. How about this? Would this work for you? A baby though they show no signs it has been proven they are capable of complex thought. In fact I remember tunes which my mother played while I was in the womb [Beethoven's flight of the...

Chips Hasty generilization am I right? Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence. It commonly involves basing a broad conclusion upon the statistics of a survey of a small group that fails to...

Mehaha I'm pretty sure the fault was all mine, since I'm the one who needs a "higher level of understanding". When you say full human, do you mean a fully develop one? Bun What gives us the right indeed. Shouldn't I be asking that question?

Ok any legitimate sources for that? Cus I got one that says otherwise....Do you still remember this Mehaha? [SIZE=2][I][B] This is getting circular Mehaha....

CassinnoChips What fallacy would that be? And no, the number of cell doesn't matter, it's the structure of it compare to that of an unborn child. One is alive(a simple individual structured cell) and one is not(a complex individual structure of cells). That was your point against me remember...

You do know a newborn baby isn't fully develop yet though right?

Yes, but ice is still water. Beginning of a new human being. The very start of a new human being....What are you talking about? Do you mean on a development stage?