Which one of us is the more experienced debater? Take a pick.
Harlequin understands infinity and strongly implements it with his ideas. He is of course, Christian. His great friendliness alone is good incentive for people to agree with him. Few people can win an argument against him because they're not accustomed to some of his ideas and how he can convince the other side with them.
I'm also a Christian, but sometimes a bit more technical. I can spot a weak argument quickly, and can also use bracketed points to help me make my decision on what side to be on. I usually come into a debate expecting to take a few hits, and usually understand the opposition's argument before they say anything. If you have an hour, I can debate religion or life
.
Harlequin understands infinity and strongly implements it with his ideas. He is of course, Christian. His great friendliness alone is good incentive for people to agree with him. Few people can win an argument against him because they're not accustomed to some of his ideas and how he can convince the other side with them.
I'm also a Christian, but sometimes a bit more technical. I can spot a weak argument quickly, and can also use bracketed points to help me make my decision on what side to be on. I usually come into a debate expecting to take a few hits, and usually understand the opposition's argument before they say anything. If you have an hour, I can debate religion or life
.