Search results

my comment was not directed at any one in particular, no offense was meant I was referring to society as a whole being over prudish to the point where such a natural act that is necessary for proper development is so shamed upon, there is no reason for the breast to even be covered in the first...

The sorrell's fine touch study - they measured many different points on the penis (19 on intact, fewer on cut) and the parts removed HAD 4 TIMES THE SENSITIVITY as the msot sensitive parts left after circumcision completely wrong, it's assumed to be by cut men and even doctors as from their...

but that is where you are wrong, there is a very clear right or wrong, you act like it is only a cosmetic thing when it for a fact removes the most sensitive parts of the penis and it changes the mechanics of how a penis works not to mention the human rights issues WHAT!!!!!!! please think about...

I think it's amazingly absurd that americans have such a distasteful view f a natural and necessary function of mammals once you go to a nude beach though and get accustomed to it you realize that nudity is no big deal....

last post...really? many people do jsut fine without limbs, or with only one eye, or can only hear in one ear, some might be missing toes, just because they get by doesn't mean they aren't missing out, that's not a fact that says it's ok, women who are circumcised do "just fine" and often say...

100's of studies.... come on, there have only been a few, please post links to them (and not links to multiple articles referring to the same study) and then compare how in depth their study was, did they test just 3 points or 18 points? seriously I would like to see a study as detailed as the...

first it's not "extra" foreskin, it's the natural amount of foreksin, second are you intact or not, you claim you know, were you intact and then cut, or were you cut and then restored? how do you know? from the only study I found where they compared in a fair way comparing parts that exist only...

so protection from a permanent life changing mutilation that forever reduces sexual pleasure is less important then getting something paid for? really? I would gladly pay all that out of pocket to have my genitals intact, without question. BTW......the blame on abortion/birth pills lays solely...

they don't die from the circumcision, they die from infections gained during the circumcision or from the wound that's healing, The infection cannot be directly blamed on either the birth or the circumcision but can only be guessed at from the difference in infants that die from infections and...

no child left behind is a huge failure, should really be labeled hold everyone back to the level of the worst student. we actually let creationists preach their thoughts as if it was education as if knowledge could always be debatable at such ridiculous levels, should we offer alchemy as an...

I agree, and it's also quite prevalent in the the two threads on genital mutilation here. We have a law protecting WOMEN ONLY from genital cutting, but cut right away on a man for whatever trivial reason you want, it's absurd and nothign gets more sexist then that.

you have a skewed view of this procedure, I read about this group that went to research what these horrible men were forcing on these women.... and what they found was that it was generally WOMEN that were forcing it on women and that men didn't really care too much. AND MALE CIRCUMCISION...

the foreskin not being retractable is likely from poor care as an infant, regardless it can be cured easily and non invasively with steroid cream and some stretching exercises (if you get a foreskin friendly doctor, otherwise they will just recommend cutting) the crushing of the clamp used in...

Think this needs it's own thread since the female circumcision thread was going this way.... When I found out I was cut I wanted to believe it was good and tried to for a while but the logic just wasn't there. I had visitied many pro and anti-circ websites and had also stumbled on some foreskin...

no, it doesn't 1.) it's not extra baggage, it's a very beneficial part of the male body that adds the gliding sensation as well as contains the most sensitive nerves as proven by the sorrell study. Circumcision rates are dropping fast as people now have access to the information about how...

I counted it because it was recent and impartial, there is a ton of old literature and beliefs still about the male genitals, heck my high school "health" book didn't even have the foreskin shown, it was just assumed to not be there, And a ton of people repeat the same drivel about it having no...

anybody been able to get in? I have it downloaded but can't seem to get when it's open

the marriage bed.com is hardly a source for understandign scientific things, the sorrell's study was done recently and even if there are more nerve endings there the sorrell's study proves that the ones on the foreskin are far more sensitive then the rest of the penis from an american source...

Solar storms have happened before, to say one will never happen again is just insane, this just emphasize that we should have some ability to bring the grid back up if this does happen, or even better prevent it by shutting down the grid if necessary to avoid damage

WRONG!!! google sorrell's fine touch study, the parts removed via male genital mutilation (circumcision) are up to 4 TIMES more sensitive then the most sensitive parts left. FOUR TIMES!!!!! and male circumcision does not? granted most men don't know it because they don't know the difference...