Search results

except for the little tiny part that homosexual behaviour is attested in humans since paleolythic and in animals for quite a lot before that. see Bonobo monkeys. If you seriously believe this is randomly happening in nature all at the same time right now, you have reached the peak of cognitive...

or that same Bible recommended killing women wearing clothes made from two types of cloth, endorsed incest and rape? Just saying

your link does not support your argument. Point me to where it states what you just said/

it is not a matter of abusing power. But we live in a world in which children are expected to be automatons and teachers are expected to pour knowledge into their heads with a bucket. And we see the results. I believe teachers should go back to being respected dispers of knowledge, the school...

You haven't made an argument, just repeated your prejudices. This is not an argument in any way, shape or form. random comparisons do not make a valid argument. I will try to explain it to you slowly so you can understand me: natural selection works in such a way that what doesn't work gets...

my point was with the term- namely the fact that we can destroy humanity, but not THE WORLD. No, we don't have enough nukes to seriously damage the planet per se. An asteroid to hit us tomorrow? They don't work like that. Crash explained in the asteroid thread how mechanics work. Volcanoes...

proving once again that the so called pro life movement only cares about punishing women for having sex. generous of you. Minus the proving part. less than 6% of rapes get reported due to the way society works.

It does make sense that a group of people wit similar backgrounds and circumstances will react in a similar pattern to the same stimuli. That is what research is based, but it hasnothing to do with stereotyping, as it uses data not anecdotal evidence and prejudice.

Minus the facts part.

the sheer arrogance of it... "what if the world ended tomorrow"? My ass. The world, the planet doesn't end that easily. As of now, there is NOTHING us puny humans can do that affects it. We can destroy ourselves and paralyze the biiosphere indeed. But Earth will go on. As far as earth goes, we...

?????????/ Where? I did not at any pointgiven myself the authority to decide what is right and what is not. All I have done was to reach the logical conclusions of a chain of logical facts.

How does one define "end of the world"? would the planet explode? Would the sun go kaboom?

Stereotying is bad, but it prevents me from usng my own head and that is good? How about you don't say "them"? How about just judging peole by their own merits? How about just taking them for who they are and treating them as full human beings?

The Bible has been changed over centuries and millenia, things have been taken out and put back in by people who were not God. As such, the Bible's credibility eve if we are willing to assume it may have had a divine origin to begin with is compromised. You tore yourself apart for being...

No, and I did not claim to. Logics would help you tremendously in achieving that. Homosexuality and heterosexuality are by no means exclusive, they have been coexisting alongside each other for millenia. It has been a theory for decades that homosexuality is nature's way to regulate...

I meant not in a phisycal way.

It is first and foremost important to admit that the whole system of thinking of which the situation in the American schools is biased and wrong, and only afterwards to determine if there are such means to repair what is damaged or to overhaul the whole thing. the system of thinking that says...

Exactly what makes you think you have the right or authority to decide what is or is not right? If something is not right from the POV of nature, it gets eliminated by natural selection. yet homosexuality in animals is a fairly spread phenomenon and as such it proves your theory incorrect. An...

First and foremost, how do you define a stereotype? If you say that stereotypes= inaccurate generalisations, then I have to agree with your point. However, human beings are naturally judgemental, and we need to remember that. It does make sense to categorize people andput them into little small...

I can't see my sig :(