Search results

No, atheism and agnosticism are not comparable for precisely the same reason you can't compare apples with oranges. If you want to debate these definitions further, I suggest you do so in the other thread (but you refuse to apparently, so this discussion is probably over). For the umpteenth...

Und ich frage mich, warum Sie "Schnee" heißen. You do know what "Schnee" means, do you, Schnee?

Vielleicht einmal war da jemand, aber ich bin nicht so sicher, dass sie noch hier sind. Es tut mir leid, aber ich kann nicht genau erinnern, was ihrer Benutzername war. Vielleicht wenn du hier oder in Shoutbox mehr posten, vielleicht wurd jemand, wer sie kennt, dir sagen.

Ich denke, ich soll, weil ich auf der Meinung bin, nach Göttingen zu gehen. Und ich denke Göttingen soll in der Nähe von Hannover sein.

Und dafür gibt es hier so viele Englisch Sprecher und Sprecherin.

Naja, ich denke nichts in Deutschland muss so weit weg sein...zumindest für jemand, wer in Kanada wohnt.

Schreib so viele Deutsch, als du willst; ich bin mir sicher, dass ich es verstehen werde.

Ich gehe nach Darmstadt.

Danke! Ich reise nach Deutschland im Sommer.

I'd say "wo wir Arsch tretten und Final Fantasy spielen! Und wir sind noch nicht geschaft mit Final Fantasy". Don't quite know about the last one, but that's my take on it.

Wie ist mit, "Ich bin ein Berliner!" My professor said it means I am a jelly-filled donut. What you probably want is "Ich bin Berliner".

Hallo! Es freut mich sehr, ein anderer Deutschsprecher zu sehen.

Tatsätlich, habe ich es fast getan. Well, I was about to.

Ich lache nicht. Wilkommen bei Final Fantasy Forums! Deutsch ist auch nicht meine Muttersprache, also bist du nicht allein. Ich wünsche dir auch, dass du eine schöne Zeit hier haben sollst. Hopefully, my German wasn't too terrible.

And why do you expect it to? That wouldn't be the focus of science anyways. Even if you didn't find it useful (ironically, the only reason you can say anything about the shape of the Earth or its orbit is because of science), you have not provided any other useful method of determining if...

We don't have to prove anything, and here's why--your assertion that it is impossible for scientists to know what happened 3500 years ago simply because they did not find what you thought they should have found proves nothing, so we are just as unknowledgeable about the plagues happening as we...

No, you started the assertions, and I'm simply pointing out to you that I find the justifications for them unsatisfactory. You have not bested me at anything, quite simply because I have not presented anything other than refutations to arguments that you have provided. In fact, based on what I...

And again, I ask: prove the assertion that it is not scientifically possible to know what happened 3500 years ago. Because you haven't proven anything, and we've explained why. I'm sorry if you've just decided to ignore what we said about it because you don't like it, but our complaints fall...

And if we disagree, and can explain why, maybe you should provide a refutation if you still think we're wrong. And by the way, vaguely saying your logic is sound without demonstrating it or complaining about the nature of the debate does not count as a sound refutation. It's not about the...

Then please identify the logical fallacies or present your argument that uses this logic that shows this is incorrect, and explain how that refutes their claims. No more excuses. No more dancing around the issue. We want an answer, here, and now. Oh really? Then can you please answer these...