http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/andres-serrano-piss-christ-destroyed-christian-protesters
This was my single favorite work of art ever.
I am at a loss for words.
I have recently heard people argue that Islam is a greater threat to the world than Christianity, as Christianity has...
You can't really say how it was intended to be taken, can you? We can only say how it has been taken, and this video should demonstrate adequately that it has been taken as a history book and a science book.
The fact is that just because you're intelligent enough to realize that the bible...
I don't think it is.
Or maybe it's because we all, deep down, want to break the universe.
I know that I definitely want to.
Not very deep down.
I'm basically talking about it right now.
DON'T DRINK USA TAP WATER AND MILK FLUORIDE AND STEROIDS POISONING ,AND COME TO ROMANTIC ITALY GIRLS FIGHT THE MATERIALISTIC VISION OF GIRLS OF USA UK CANADA AUSTRALIA NZ ALL THIS JEWU$A ILLUMINATIUK BASED CULTURES...
As someone who is high right this moment, I think that not only should marijuana be legalized, I think it should be mandatory that ever man, woman, and child indulges in it at least once, preferably a dozen times, in their life. I cannot think of a single non-corporate reason to keep it illegal...
The thing about Tacitus is that Christians really shouldn't use him as support for their claims, because he doesn't support their claims in any way. See, something interesting happens when you try to look for any reference Tacitus makes to an actual, historical Jesus: You can't find one. He...
There was a recent poll in Mississippi of Republicans.
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/04/mississippi-46-of-polled-republicans.html
Yeah.
I don't want this to get marked as spam, but I really don't have anything else to say that the picture doesn't say for me.
This was done two weeks...
Because most of my debates end up on this topic anyway, I'd like to make a topic about the historical events depicted in the Bible, or rather, the complete lack of support given to the Bible by history.
Here are some things I think, feel free to choose any of them to respond to.
Jesus never...
I've never seen that happen. I doubt anyone has ever seen that happen, and that's just a really poor example.
The reason that people question religion is because it doesn't make a lick of sense. It's not something that "cool" kids do, because cool kids are too busy hanging out with their "youth...
None of my insults are thinly veiled.
Maybe you should be clear in what you're saying. Or maybe I do get it right, and you realize how fucking retarded you sound, so you try to damage control it back to something acceptable. From the record of the posters on this website, that seems much more...
No, this is how you guys argue:
1. Present a topic.
2. Say something stupid.
3. Get pissed off when your mental superior tells you you're wrong.
4. Deny what you said, even when it's quoted back for you.
5. Say that any attempts to clarify the situation to you is "off topic".
6. Bitch...
I worship MYSELF, you can call it GAAHLISM.
I hate Christianity! I love dicks, I am gay as fuck! I am BLACK METAL.
You want to try me, punk? Go to the SLEEPING FOREST, and allow me to demonstrate how FUCKING WRONG YOU ARE.
Unless you agree with me. Then you're right.
As a gay man, this is a very exciting discovery for the possibilities it raises.
But it is NOT definitely a discovery of a gay man, and it is not a caveman at all. The article misrepresents the time period, but a lot of people in here have apparently neglected to read what it actually says. The...
First of all, this is a topic in the Religious Debate already. There's no reason to remake it.
Second of all, it's relevant when people are misusing the term, so it's impossible to continue conversations if we don't use the same language. The only people who complain about derailing threads are...
See, but there's a lot of assumptions being made in this topic that have nothing to do with this article. I will list them now.
1. The article never says that the caveman is definitively gay. It could be a third gender type deal.
2. This wasn't actually a "caveman". This was many hundreds of...
First of all, I'm not your buddy, pal.
Second of all, yeah, it seems like you are trying to say "yes", but you keep saying yeds. What is that about? That's not a word, dood.
Third, everything you just said makes no sense. Everyone who read the article knew they were archaeologists. Everyone...
Well, no, it is, though. I worry that you really might be falling for the hype of a sub-par game with a decent story. In fact, I'm not even sure if I'd say decent story.
But it can't. Nothing is good, objectively. We can say something is good, objectively, WITHIN A SUBJECTIVE SYSTEM, but...
SO, now you're making up a, what is this, third definition of science? None of which have had anything to do with science? Listen, BUDDY, science is a colloquial term for the body of knowledge that has been gained through the SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
The SCIENTIFIC METHOD IS THIS RIGHT HERE.
What...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.