My Viewpoints

This is the fundamental summary of my opinion:

I like: video games (especially RPGs), motion pictures, Star Wars, computer, television (especially truTV), recreation, R&B and soul music, video game music (especially Final Fantasy music), jazz, male superiority, female fashion that complies with male wishes (or girly girl fashion), patriarchy, separation of church and state, liberal democracies, masculism, liberalism, libertarianism, liberal democracies, Internet, Wikipedia, Wookieepedia, Rhapsody music service, CD and MP3 players, multi-channel amplifiers, Japanese culture, modern sophisticated cultures, digital color photography, computer graphics, modernism, nudism/naturism, piano, violin, arranged or orchestrated music, cutting-edge technology, modern architecture

I dislike: video game censorship and regulation, strict authorities, oppressive regimes, feminist ideology, female superiority, chip music, female fashion that does not comply with male wishes (or tomboy fashion), persecution of femininity, union of church and state, matriarchy, anything offensive to the male sex, having an intimate relationship, manufacturing in the People's Republic of China for non-Chinese companies, greedy business practices, bogus or draconian laws, prudery, fundamentalism or oppressive religious groups, sepia photography, repressive cultures, fascism, racism, ableism

Please do not ban me just because of my opinion described above. If I cannot contest my ban from TFF, I will take the case to court and maybe have TFF shutdown.

My favorite third-party character is Yuna. My favorite Nintendo character is Ayra from Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I dislike: [...]feminist ideology, female superiority, [...], female fashion that does not comply with male wishes (or tomboy fashion), persecution of femininity, [...], matriarchy, anything offensive to the male sex, having an intimate relationship, [...]

Click to expand...

In other words, you're a woman-hating perv who thinks women's place is in the kitchen and whenever they are out buying food they should dress as slutty as possible?

Tedius Zanarukando said:

Please do not ban me just because of my opinion described above.

Click to expand...

We won't ban you unless you start taking your views too much to heart and insult other members for disagreeing with you on them (which I just did above).

Tedius Zanarukando said:

If I cannot contest my ban from TFF, I will take the case to court and maybe have TFF shutdown.

Click to expand...

Typical Americans: If you don't like it, slap a lawsuit at it.

The administrators of a forum have the right to deny you access from their web site for any reason (or lack thereof).
Being able to post on a forum is a privilege, not a right.
There is no free speech on a forum. You will conform to the wishes of the administrators or your access will be revoked.

That being said, we are not Nazis.
However, it would be preferred if you would stop talking about TFF. I think I speak for the majority of staff when I say we don't give a ferret's anus about how that forum is ran or your membership records with them. We care about how you act on OUR site.
Do note that this is not a threat to ban you, it's simply a notification that we don't really need to hear about your differences with another forum, as such topics tend to instigate drama.

In other words, you're a woman-hating perv who thinks women's place is in the kitchen and whenever they are out buying food they should dress as slutty as possible?

Click to expand...

I was not intending to think that a woman's place is in the kitchen. I am not saying that women should not attend the workforce, as long as it does not go too far. I just do not like for heterosexual women to be fashioned after the male sex. I do not like women to wear pants or wear a boyish haircut.

The administrators of a forum have the right to deny you access from their web site for any reason (or lack thereof).
Being able to post on a forum is a privilege, not a right.
There is no free speech on a forum. You will conform to the wishes of the administrators or your access will be revoked.

Click to expand...

The TFF administrators banned me from their forum for a bad reason. They did it with the intent to force their opinion or someone else's opinion on me. That is like banning someone for disagreeing with the opinion of the staff. I am not intending to post about TFF. I would talk about it in the PMs. I do not always contest a ban. Sometimes I contest a ban if I feel too alienated from the ban. I feel very alienated from the ban. I will not contest it now. I will contest it some months later.

I am willing to act well at this board. Okay?

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I was not intending to think that a woman's place is in the kitchen. I am not saying that women should not attend the workforce, as long as it does not go too far. I just do not like for heterosexual women to be fashioned after the male sex. I do not like women to wear pants or wear a boyish haircut.

Click to expand...

Oh, so you contradict yourself instead.
First you say you dislike women having a choice in what they wear and how they look, then you say you dislike repressive cultures.

Does not compute.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

The TFF administrators banned me with the intent to force their opinion or someone else's opinion on me. That is a wrong reason to ban me. That is like banning someone for disagreeing with the opinion of the staff. I am not intending to post about TFF. I would talk about it in the PMs.

Click to expand...

Without knowing the specifics, I can say with relative certainty that the TFF administrators banned you because they did not agree with your views and/or the way you expressed them on their forum.

Just like you would be banned from a Christian board for posting about Allah or whatever.

The administrators aren't trying to force anyone's opinions on anyone, and they remove anybody who they feel are (attempting to) forcing/force their opinions on people, or dislike the opinions altogether.
I know that if someone came in here and said they like to play doctor with little boys, I'd ban them on the spot. Provided they were being serious about it, that is.

Just so it's completely clear:
Administrators of any website have the right to revoke your access privileges from their site any time and for any reason, or lack of any reason.
There's nothing your constitution or amendments or anything you have ever learned about the land of the free and the brave can do about that irrefutable point.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I was not intending to think that a woman's place is in the kitchen. I am not saying that women should not attend the workforce, as long as it does not go too far. I just do not like for heterosexual women to be fashioned after the male sex. I do not like women to wear pants or wear a boyish haircut.

Click to expand...

Oh really? Women not in the workforce? You're basically saying: "Go back into the kitchen whore." Really? What else are we going to do? Twiddle our thumbs and sit around and watch soap operas?

Too fucking bad, I love wearing jeans. Welcome to 2007. (Almost 2008.)

Well, I'm going to contact TFF and see if you're telling the truth or not. If you're lying... Congrats another ban for you. Oh wait, I'm sorry I'm a woman I DON'T HAVE POWERS ACCORDING TO YOU AM I RITE!?

I do not believe in romantic relationship. Female superiority is defined as the belief that the female sex is superior to the male sex and that women should have more rights than men, and that men should suffer. I did not say that I dislike female employment. I do not want female employment to come at the expense of femininity. I have a good reason for my opinion. Professional advancement can come without the expense of femininity. If you could give me the time, then I could explain my opinion. There are some passages in the Bible that support my opinion in regards to women. I am not trying to force this opinion on you.

Administrators of any website have the right to revoke your access privileges from their site any time and for any reason, or lack of any reason.
There's nothing your constitution or amendments or anything you have ever learned about the land of the free and the brave can do about that irrefutable point.

Click to expand...

Although administrators have the irrefutable right to ban anyone for any reason or lack of reason, the ban can be contested by the banned user if the user feels that he or she was alienated from the ban. It may take a long time to contest it. Administrators usually do not ban anyone without a reason.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I will only force my opinion on women's fashion to women who are close to me. Female superiority is defined as the belief that the female sex is superior to the male sex and that women should have more rights than men, and that men should suffer. I did not say that I dislike female employment. I do not want female employment to come at the expense of femininity. I have a good reason for my opinion. Professional advancement can come without the expense of femininity. If you could give me the time, then I could explain my opinion. There are many passages in the Bible that support my opinion in regards to women.

Click to expand...

You keep contracting your self hun. You keep saying one thing and then say another.

Oh boo hoo men suffer? Wait, who are the ones who give birth again...?

You know... The Bible was written by men... You know... 2000 years ago? You're little Bible isn't going to do shit. Congrats on using passages that were written 2000 years ago by MEN.

I can see why the fuck you we're banned from TFF. You do realize most moderators are women right?

Yes, I come off as a bitch. Why? I don't like having new members suddenly join the forums and right off the bat they say shit about women.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I will only force my opinion on women's fashion to women who are close to me.

Click to expand...

Do you even know what the term "contradict yourself" means?
How can you be against oppression and yet force your opinion on anyone?

For the sake of womankind, I hope no woman is close to you.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

Female superiority is defined as the belief that the female sex is superior to the male sex and that women should have more rights than men, and that men should suffer.

Click to expand...

But you support male superiority, which makes you not only just as bad, but a dinosaur in terms of equality.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I did not say that I dislike female employment. I do not want female employment to come at the expense of femininity.

Click to expand...

They only enforce gender quotations because male chauvinistic people like you exist, who wouldn't hire a woman for anything other than secretary jobs.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I have a good reason for my opinion.

Click to expand...

And Hitler had a good reason to kill Jews.
That does not mean he was in any way, shape or form correct.

And yes, I did just go there. I just Godwin'd this thread and I know it.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

There are many passages in the Bible that support my opinion in regards to women.

Click to expand...

So passages of text from a book written TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO should be applied to modern-day society, eh?

In the Koran, women are forbidden to educate themselves in anything that existed 2000 years ago.
That's why all women from Muslim countries are computer programmers.


With opinions like yours, I would tread VERY carefully around these parts.
I'm not trying to oppress your opinion, but the manner in which you advocate your opinions will be watched over like a hawk circling its prey.

Remember the words of Abraham Lincoln: "I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice." Some boards that I was banned from, like TFF, EyesonFF, and FESS (a Fire Emblem board) did strict justice on me.

you do know lincoln was a rascist dont you?

some of the stuff you said was chauvinistic and misogynistic, which is not cool.

but im sure you didnt mean to be offensive?

so like welcome

However, I believe that the forum staves have been deceived by dominant culture. I am an antifeminist anyway. My views toward females are controversial, but they are not intended to be misogynistic. I am aware that they can be mistaken for misogyny. Any political agenda that would bring about a saner society is not without criticism from forum staves. I have a political agenda which I found that will greatly improve society, although many will unwittingly disagree. Abraham Lincoln actually did help abolish African slavery. Dominant culture is culture that is often enforced on just about any message board. I believe that dominant culture is not without errors and needs to be corrected.

Oh, it has been a long, long time since I entered another debate thread. You see, I am not in favor of any movement whose purpose is to place one gender above the other. Before my eyes, both men and women are equally talented to take whatever role they want, regardless of how hard the job is. I do believe that in the house, the power/rule should be a common agreement. I tend to disagree to those who say that Bible is a somewhat sexist showing some favoritism towards men, forgive me if I got something wrong, but the Bible should always be part of humanity and our lives. You must remember that: 1) was written mostly by men, I think that one book was written by a woman, and 2) The epoch in which it was written, which was very sexist. Also, not all of those books were written by those whose names are the tittles, some of them were written by the disciples, of the disciples of the disciples of those people, according to my "Humanities" class teacher.

Now on the topic and avoiding any more derailment, I believe that no rule, whether is as simple as leading a home or as complicated as leading a whole country, should be based on the slavery of others (because there are many types of slavery you know), no matter what the gender, race, or religion. Women don't belong to the kitchen, they choose that role IF THEY WANT. For example, if I marry a good woman, and I pray to God to place a good woman on my path, the cooking will be a mutual agreement. She won't cook all 7 days of week because I find it quite abusive. Some of my friends say that I am too "soft" with women, that they should be treated with less consideration, which is quite stupid. Again, both men and women deserve equal respect, though respect is earned, not obligatory, for both sides.

For example, if I see a woman (any age, mostly from 13 and up) acting like whore, I won't think that woman deserves any respect if she doesn't respect herself first. The men can go as much as the woman allows it in a relationship. Woman have the choice to decide of they want their kids to believe that women should stay in the kitchen and that male rules over all. All relations are based on respect, and a relationship that lacks respect is as good as dead.

(I'll take a break and later I'll post my views on forums)

You need to realize that women are different from men. Feminists did not accept that fact. Female fashion cannot be the same as male fashion. I am not saying that women belong to the kitchen. Feminism can lend itself to female superiority, and it has lent itself to the rise of male crime.

obvisiously men and women are different. no one would deny that, but they are still equal. you said you didnt like fascism but saying women cant dress how they like is just a bit fascist. feminism is the cause of equality for women and anyone who is against that is either misgyonistic or chauvinistic.
and anyone who is misgyonistic or chauvinistic is just wrong, moraly and literally.

you said you were celibate didnt you? without using the word celibate though

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I was not intending to think that a woman's place is in the kitchen. I am not saying that women should not attend the workforce, as long as it does not go too far. I just do not like for heterosexual women to be fashioned after the male sex. I do not like women to wear pants or wear a boyish haircut.

I am willing to act well at this board. Okay?

Click to expand...

But saying that women wearing pants and having possible short hair is wrong??? There is nothing wrong with what a woman choses to wear. This is 2008, not the 1900s. Women have a right to wear pants and whatever hair style they chose. You'll do well with the female population. Do you tell your girlfriend or wife what to wear and how to do her hair?

Tedius Zanarukando said:

You need to realize that women are different from men. Feminists did not accept that fact.

Click to expand...

Yes, women are different than men. We know that. And it's not that feminists didn't accept that fact. What they didn't accept is that they were expected to stay at home all day, cook, clean and pop out babies. Women deserve just as many rights as men.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

Female fashion cannot be the same as male fashion.

Click to expand...

And female fashion isn't the same as male fashion. Yes, women wear pants. What a fucking crime! Women are wearing sneakers? Blasphemy! Seriously, if you haven't noticed, the design of women's clothing is very different than men's. It's a woman's choice what she wants to wear. Why should it be dictated by what a man wants to see her wear?

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I am not saying that women belong to the kitchen. Feminism can lend itself to female superiority,

Click to expand...

And chauvinism promotes male superiority.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

and it has lent itself to the rise of male crime.

Click to expand...

Care to explain how?

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I dislike: video game censorship and regulation, strict authorities, oppressive regimes, feminist ideology, female superiority, chip music, female fashion that does not comply with male wishes (or tomboy fashion), persecution of femininity, union of church and state, matriarchy, anything offensive to the male sex, having an intimate relationship

Click to expand...

Newsflash for ya, Mr. Sexist, women usually dress in a way that DRAWS male attention (i.e. complies with male wishes).

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I was not intending to think that a woman's place is in the kitchen. I am not saying that women should not attend the workforce, as long as it does not go too far. I just do not like for heterosexual women to be fashioned after the male sex. I do not like women to wear pants or wear a boyish haircut.

Click to expand...

We're not the 1950's anymore, pal. It sounds like you just want them to stay home and look like little dolls that you can play with.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I do not believe in romantic relationship.

Click to expand...

Have fun when you're old and lonely and no one comes to visit you at your deathbed then.

Female superiority is defined as the belief that the female sex is superior to the male sex and that women should have more rights than men, and that men should suffer. I did not say that I dislike female employment. I do not want female employment to come at the expense of femininity. I have a good reason for my opinion. Professional advancement can come without the expense of femininity. If you could give me the time, then I could explain my opinion. There are some passages in the Bible that support my opinion in regards to women. I am not trying to force this opinion on you.

Click to expand...

You don't want female employment because it would make girls lose their feminine aspects? That is officially the douchebaggiest way of saying they shouldn't work. Congratulations sir.

*hands you the Biggest Douchebag In the Universe award*

And guess what? The Bible was written over 2000 years ago in the Middle East. It's ancient, backwards, and unfair. Get your nose out of the Bible and stop using a 2000+ year old Israeli tribe's customs as an excuse to be sexist.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

am an antifeminist anyway. My views toward females are controversial

Click to expand...

No, they're stupid, wrong, and sexist.

Any political agenda that would bring about a saner society is not without criticism from forum staves. I have a political agenda which I found that will greatly improve society, although many will unwittingly disagree.

Click to expand...

Then take your sexist bullshit to a political forum and GTFO. As a matter of fact, try telling your local congressman your backwards ideas and see what they think of it. Removing females from the workforce wouldn't improve society in any way. As a matter of fact, it would kill the economy and make us no better than Arabic nations.


Mod Edit: Please do not result to calling members names that would come off as an insult.

~SapphireStar~ said:

But saying that women wearing pants and having possible short hair is wrong??? There is nothing wrong with what a woman choses to wear. This is 2008, not the 1900s. Women have a right to wear pants and whatever hair style they chose. You'll do well with the female population. Do you tell your girlfriend or wife what to wear and how to do her hair?

Click to expand...

I can show you evidence that wearing short hair or trousers is wrong. The idea of short hair for women began in the 1920s. The idea of women in pants began in the 1970s before I was born. I feel that the idea of women being fashioned after men is going out of hand. I think that a few of the rights that men have are incompatible for women to have.

You don't want female employment because it would make girls lose their feminine aspects? That is officially the douchebaggiest way of saying they shouldn't work. Congratulations sir.

Click to expand...

I am not saying that women should be removed from the workforce altogether. Female employment does not necessarily come at the expense of femininity. There are some jobs that are not femininity friendly. I do not want schools, universities, workforce training centers, or employers to force their female subjects to be fashioned after the male sex.

Yes, women are different than men. We know that. And it's not that feminists didn't accept that fact. What they didn't accept is that they were expected to stay at home all day, cook, clean and pop out babies. Women deserve just as many rights as men.

Click to expand...

Women were not confined to cooking or housekeeping. The feminist claim is false. It is actually more fun for women to stay at home than to work fulltime. They can play video games, listen to music, watch television or motion pictures, or surf the Internet as long as they want, and they will not have to follow orders of people they are not close to. They can raise their children better. Children of stay-at-home mothers are less likely to become a burden on society as adults than children of full-time working mothers. Feminism rose at a time when labor-saving and leisure-creating devices were not yet invented, and it is men who invented those devices. Female employment is economically necessary in some households.

My viewpoint was partly influenced by my parents' religion, Jehovah's Witnesses, which I found to be a cult of Christianity. It is said that the oppressive religious group leads to psychological abuse.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I can show you evidence that wearing short hair or trousers is wrong. The idea of short hair for women began in the 1920s.

Click to expand...

No you can't. No such evidence exists. Murder is wrong. Rape is wrong. A woman having short hair and wearing trousers isn't wrong. For god's sake, it's just hair and clothes.

There are some jobs that are not femininity friendly. I do not want schools, universities, workforce training centers, or employers to force their female subjects to be fashioned after the male sex.

Click to expand...

Say what? Being a teacher is one of the most "feminine" jobs a woman can have, their role has traditionally been to teach their own children and teaching others' only expands that. As for employers forcing their women to dress in pants? Uh.....last I checked, only restaurants, factories and the like have dress codes like that, and it's for safety reasons. Women generally wear pants because the WANT to. I guess that concept is hard for you to grasp.

Women were not confined to cooking or housekeeping. The feminist claim is false. It is actually more fun for women to stay at home than to work fulltime.

Click to expand...

I want to congratulate you. My mouth actually dropped open when I read that, and it takes alot to shock me that much.

They can play video games, listen to music, watch television or motion pictures, or surf the Internet as long as they want, and they will not have to follow orders of people they are not close to. They can raise their children better.

Click to expand...

I can't believe you actually hold those views. Women would actually become extremely BORED if they lived like that. My mother is a prime example. Over the past few years my mother has gone back to college, obtained a teaching license and taught at various private schools because of that very issue. She homeschooled me, but once I was off to highschool and college, she had nothing to do at home and nobody to talk to. She WANTED to have a job and something to do.

Children of stay-at-home mothers are less likely to become a burden on society as adults than children of full-time working mothers.

Click to expand...

Not really. Give us one credible source supporting you on that. Oh wait, you can't.

My viewpoint was partly influenced by my parents' religion, Jehovah's Witnesses, which I found to be a cult of Christianity. It is said that the oppressive religious group leads to psychological abuse.

Click to expand...

Well that explains alot

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I can show you evidence that wearing short hair or trousers is wrong. The idea of short hair for women began in the 1920s. The idea of women in pants began in the 1970s before I was born. I feel that the idea of women being fashioned after men is going out of hand. I think that a few of the rights that men have are incompatible for women to have.

Click to expand...

Okay. You keep stating that you can show evidence yet all you keep bringing are your feelings and point of views. Newsflash: That's not evidence. Please, I would love to see some sort of concrete evidence that I'm doing some horrible wrong by wearing a pair of jeans.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

I am not saying that women should be removed from the workforce altogether. Female employment does not necessarily come at the expense of femininity. There are some jobs that are not femininity friendly. I do not want schools, universities, workforce training centers, or employers to force their female subjects to be fashioned after the male sex.

Click to expand...

Again, you're contradicting yourself and bringing up nonsensical points. When I was in high school, most of my teachers wore skirts and blouses as did my female professors in college. In office settings, particularly those that make their employees dress for business, many women choose to wear skirts, hose and heels. If they choose to wear a business suit, well that's their choice but I haven't seen any signs posted in my office saying "WOMEN MUST WEAR PANTS!"

Tedius Zanarukando said:

Women were not confined to cooking or housekeeping. The feminist claim is false. It is actually more fun for women to stay at home than to work fulltime.

Click to expand...

Are you a woman? No, didn't think so. Who are you to say it's more fun for a woman to stay at home than work full-time? Some women enjoy their full time jobs. You're basically repeating your sexist views and trying to candy-coat it. It isn't working.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

They can play video games, listen to music, watch television or motion pictures, or surf the Internet as long as they want, and they will not have to follow orders of people they are not close to.

Click to expand...

Oh yes, that's every woman's desire.

Tedius Zanarukando said:

They can raise their children better. Children of stay-at-home mothers are less likely to become a burden on society as adults than children of full-time working mothers. Feminism rose at a time when labor-saving and leisure-creating devices were not yet invented, and it is men who invented those devices. Female employment is economically necessary in some households.

Click to expand...

It'd be kind of hard to raise children in between all of the game playing, internet surfing and soap-opera watching, wouldn't it? Oh, and here's a question? What about single mothers? Should they lay around all day too? Would it be easier for them to raise their children on welfare? And by the way, leisure isn't exactly a new concept. Do you think that pre-modern humans were drones? It wasn't just work, work, work all the time. Please get out and breathe the fresh air a little. It would do you a world of good.