Can You Prove The Moon Exists?

March 5, 2007, 7:30 AM

A cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed.

Can you prove that the moon exists? Write to us at: madrev@reptiles.org

Here is the web site: http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

Some info you can find on the web site:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In 1995, the American Historical Association, in an attempt to stifle revisionist scholarship, marked the 50th anniversary of the defeat of Nazism with a resolution calling on scholars to "initiate plans now to study the significance of the Holocaust." This, however, was not enough of a blow to free academic discourse for the enemies of truth. The president of the AHA, William Leuchtenburg, was asked why the resolution did not go so far as to explicitly recognize the Holocaust as a fact of history. He answered that for a group of historians to say that there had been a Holocaust was tantamount to "an organization of astronomers saying there is a moon."

While, on the surface, this appears as nothing more than a shameless attempt to trivialize and thereby discredit the work of revisionists, it nonetheless got me to thinking: why did this historian single out the moon? Why would a scholar, so familiar with academic standards of evidence, use such language to imply that the existence of the moon, unlike any other issue, was a given and not subject to proof? What, in other words, was he trying to hide?

It was then that I embarked on my research, which has led me to this day when I can confidently make the following assertion: The Moon does not exist. As I realize this revelation may appear shocking to the average reader, allow me to repeat it:

The Moon does not exist!

This is no lie. Until recently, I, too, believed in the traditional, establishment view of the moon. But any thinking person, untainted by the biases imposed on us by the controlled media, will have no choice but to reach the conclusion I did once faced with the facts described in this account."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
What evidence do we have that there really is a moon?

1. You can see it.
2. But don’t all qualified scientists and astronomers agree that there is a moon?
3. But who could or would perpetrate such a hoax?
4. What about that "moon landing" that took place in 1969, and all of the subsequent "moon landings", as well as pictures taken by satellites and telescopes?
5. But don’t the astronauts who claim to have walked on the moon count as eyewitnesses?
6. And what about the "moon rocks" that these astronauts brought back with them?
7. Hasn’t the moon been mentioned in texts and literature throughout history?
8. But what motive could someone have for falsifying the moon?
9. But the Moon was worshipped by the ancients, long before there was the technology to create such a hoax.
10. What about references to the moon in the Bible?
11. The tides of the oceans are created by the gravatational pull of the moon.
12. Okay, but I still find this all hard to believe. What evidence do you have that there is no moon?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out the answers on that web!
Personaly i think the guy is NUTS but then again i have read a book about the moon being some strange UFO

March 5, 2007, 9:46 AM

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!

Kid where do you get this stuff? this remins me of those philosophers who were always talking crap about how the being and the world does not exists

March 5, 2007, 12:47 PM

There are a few things this person needs to get rid of in his diet-
-Stupid Pills
-happy pills
-crack
-weed
-beer
Things that he NEEDS:
-sleep
-a life
-job/school

March 5, 2007, 12:59 PM

no moon?! bwahaha!
there is always someone who has to try to prove the opposite of something..

March 5, 2007, 2:12 PM

He probably still thinks the moon is made of cheese and that santa claus is actually real.

If the moon isnt real, then wtf is that large white orb that shines in the sky at night

March 5, 2007, 2:21 PM

Wulfe is a HOMO

I hope i get banned soon for all this shit

Maybe You can see it. But think about it – without the help of so-called "experts", how do you really know what you’re looking at? It could be a hologram, projected from various government installations throughout the world. It could be a large, crudely painted balloon, held in place by helium and propelled by tiny sails and rudders (which is why it moves across the sky so slowly). Or, most likely, it could have been different things at different times and different places, depending on the technology available to the conspirators and the culture and beliefs of the population being deceived.

March 5, 2007, 2:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meikyousisui

why are u guys saying all this shit do anyone of u guys have any proof that the moon exsits or not if u don't i suggest u shut the hell up and wait for someone to see if there right To your question i just know alot of shit about space and many other things so if u can't prove the moon exists then plz shut up

I wont shut up. Im an educated person and its blatantly obvious that the moon does in fact exist. If you look to the sky on a clear non cloudy night, you will see a round white/yellow orb hanging in the sky. That, is the moon.

March 5, 2007, 2:36 PM

Once again Wulfe is a fuckin faggot that likes gay sex can he get any gayer

why are u guys saying all this shit do anyone of u guys have any proof that the moon exsits or not if u don't i suggest u shut the hell up and wait for someone to see if there right To your question i just know alot of shit about space and many other things so if u can't prove the moon exists then plz shut up

March 5, 2007, 2:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meikyousisui

Maybe You can see it. But think about it – without the help of so-called "experts", how do you really know what you’re looking at? It could be a hologram, projected from various government installations throughout the world. It could be a large, crudely painted balloon, held in place by helium and propelled by tiny sails and rudders (which is why it moves across the sky so slowly). Or, most likely, it could have been different things at different times and different places, depending on the technology available to the conspirators and the culture and beliefs of the population being deceived.

One too many conspiracy theories there If you ask me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wikipedia

The first leap in lunar observation was caused by the invention of the telescope. Galileo Galilei made especially good use of this new instrument and observed mountains and craters on the Moon's surface.

I dont think holograms were even invented in the time of galileo galilei.

March 5, 2007, 2:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladycazzeh

One too many conspiracy theories there If you ask me.

I dont think holograms were even invented in the time of galileo galilei.

ho ware u so sure that there were no holograms back in the day of galileo huh you don't have any proof.