I should play with gambits or not? please help - Page 2

March 6, 2008, 12:03 PM

thanks all of you guys. one more question i should play gambits with vann too.

March 6, 2008, 12:09 PM

they were quite annoying, but I wouldn't have survived w/out them. but I like the fact that they added an extra depth of strategy in the game. when you set the gambits correctly, your team can practically be invincible! and you tend to just watch the battles, but its like watching a football game, seeing your plays work out for better or worse.

so to answer your query, yes you should experiment with gambits. if it doesn't work for you, I suggest you use gambits for healing/support and you control attacks.

March 6, 2008, 12:16 PM

i agree with bambi, the gambits removed effort from the game which made it easier and therefore less rewarding, you can go off and eat whilst you fight a boss, it limits strategy as the gambits keep the characters fighting and keep them from dieing which means you win really

March 16, 2008, 4:45 PM

YAY for Gambits, i couldnt play without them. i always use them and hardly need to tell my characters what to do as they will just do what needs to be done, i just override the gambits if my characters are low on health or i want to do something in particluar. gambits make the game much easier to play and i think it would be much harder trying to control 3 character at the same time as the game is all in real-time, gambits are definatly worth it