Hm... I'd probably go with the standard "thousands of documented cases of healing by prayer" reasoning for this scenario.

You know, saying that it's impossible for God to preform miracles because he doesn't ALWAYS do it is like saying it's impossible for a flipped coin to land on heads because it doesn't ALWAYS land that way.

^No it's not. A flipped coin is entirely unpredictable because it has only basic factors of wind, weight, etc. to affect it. If any of those things were affected the coin would land on a certain side all the time. God, however, isn't affected by "greater things"--he supposedly is the greatest thing. If god is kind why wouldn't he want to do kind things? Isn't preventing a disaster a kind thing? If he dosen't do a kind thing we can only draw two conclusions--either he dosen't have the power to do such a thing or he dosen't care to. If he hasn't the power he isn't omnipotent; if he refuses to he isn't kind.

well I could do the whole flying speghatti monster theory on sciences' aspect on God. But I won't because I tend to think Richard Dawkins is full of hot air.

To prove God exist, well science states that it cannot neither prove nor disprove the existance of a being outside the physical universe (funny thing though, they admit the existence of "an unseen factor" that is responsible for varying paradoxes).

One other fun fact is that science, though they won't easily admit it is that for their reason to work in the universe, they admit that the universe (regardless of how it was created) is a universe created out of chaos and has become a Universe of order and balance. A very theological idea.

As for the human suffering thought on determining God's existance, remember, it states that God gave human free will. The ability to act in accordance to their own will, which allows humans to believe or not believe in a creator and allows them to cause the suffering of others along with the caring of others. (Not bad for my first post I must say.)

No, but we as humans must suffer because god refuses to make his way known...if he exists at all. Basically you're saying because we don't know his intentions for allowing harm to happen even though he can stop it we can't discredit him or his existence for it. Interestingly enough, such a powerful being would have a very easy time of making his intentions known yet he fails to do so. I won't go stuff that's not proven. I will go on something I can see, hear, feel, know. God allows suffering. There is no refuting that. Does he do allow it for a greater purpose? I don't know but until it's proven that he does I will draw the conclusion that is most logical.

Incorrect. The power to do anything and the power to know everything overrides free will. If god knows the future then my life is already written and nothing I do can change it.

That was an entirely biased and unfair comment. I have a friend that comes from there and he is none of the things you claim him to be. Try to learn things, my dear, before stating them as fact. You have no proof to back up your claim that people in New Orleans deserved a mass murder--don't you realize there were plenty of innocent people there? Or does god just ignore that and go killling at will? That would conicide with everything in the bible come to think of it--the flood after all was another such example of god's inability to deal with things rationally.