possibly the worst ff ever - Page 2

May 11, 2007, 8:36 PM

I haven't really played this game long enough to give it a ranking, but I think all FF games are good, because each has their own unique style about them, you can't turn around and say this is the worst in the series, when none of them are equal or because of a ballte system that changes with every game, the point of the battle system levelling up function is to keep it fresh, if all these games had the same battle system/levelling up, it wouldn't have made it to where it is today.

Plus the great stories that has been written for each game, but the story can be repetative in earlier games, but that's what people want in an RpG, a princess who needs rescuing, a villain and the heroes of the story.

I have the GBA version of this game and yes the battles are tough, probably the toughest in the series, but levelling up near a village is the best idea until you get the hang of it, but definately not the worst in the series.

May 11, 2007, 8:40 PM

Quote:

i think this game is considered to be so bad because it has a complex leveling system, however if you understand it, it becomes easy to manipulate and become really powerful early on in the game.

That's right. It's about as easy to manipulate as FFVIII's Junction System, and it's a lot more tedious.

Quote:

Or how about Final Fantasy Adventure? Ehh?
For any of you who have actually played this horribly horrible game, you know what i'm talking about.

Final Fantasy Adventure is actually a Mana game. Therefore it doesn't qualify.

May 12, 2007, 6:14 AM

In all honesty the story line is more fleshed out than FF1 so I don't see how that can be a knock against it. The only thing I dont like about FF2 is the ability to crank your levels early game. Attack, cancel, attack, cancel, attack, cancel, attack... etc. That really brough the game down for me. I know you can ignore it... but its still there. I hope the remake will fix it this time.

May 27, 2007, 1:37 PM

From the little I've played of FF2 so far, it still looks more enjoyable than FF1. However, does the latter's originality make it better than the 8-bit sequals that followed? It's all subjective, although I fail to see how something on the scale of FF X-2 could be classed a worse game than FF2.

May 29, 2007, 6:21 AM

I thought the GBA remake got rid of that attack-cancel bug?
Maybe I'm wrong, I'll have to go find my cartridge and see.

May 29, 2007, 10:57 AM

I think this is the worst ff game. That doesn't mean its a bad game, the worst ff game is still a good game. The stat system really bugged me. And yes i understood how it works i just didn't like it.

May 29, 2007, 10:59 AM

Crystal Chronicles was by far the worst, avoid that like the plague.
2 isnt that all bad.

May 29, 2007, 3:38 PM

for me it's not the worst FF. I enjoy the gameplay and story a lot like sneeking in towns and avoiding places with monsters and soldiers. kinda similar to FF7 & 6. though it's kinda hard in the beginning if you're new to the series. the gameplay systems is unique and innovative that it makes me wonder, is this really the 2nd final fantasy ever made??

May 30, 2007, 4:14 AM

I don't really like it, but I haven't played it much....

May 30, 2007, 4:13 PM

I actually find no flaw in any ff except ffX-2 that game was worthless. The blitzball...was...ruined...