View RSS Feed

The Illusive Man

Downloadable Content...aka Paying more for your finished game.

Rate this Entry
For my 3rd Blog in as many days, I'll be discussing a very controversial subject and I'll be leaving this one somewhat more open to debate as I feel it's a strong subject that polarizes in extremes.

My case subjects for this will be FFXIII-2 and it's premium priced skins, Mass Effect 3 and it's micro transactions for multiplayer and Saints Row the third and it's multiple premium priced packs.

The first thing you'll be thinking upon reading this is.."T.I.M you really don't like DLC do you!" You are damn right I don't, not in it's current incarnation anyway and before I get into it, i'll take you back to a time before paid DLC...a time when DLC was free..

Back in the mid-late 90's, before the next gen consoles were born, the only way to really get the online experience was PC gaming, the modding community was probably at it's peak during this era with multiple sites and fanbases dedicated to creating mods, skins, maps and even extra content for absolutely nothing but the satisfaction of seeing there dream come to life and enjoyed by many across the PC gaming world. Developers would also release there smaller amounts of extra content in patches for absolutely no charge and paid expansions were more often than not worth there price and then some.

This would be a time of harmony between customer and provider alike, unfortunatley a storm was brewing overhead and it was not to last...

With the birth of the next-gen consoles and Cloud storage a new business opportunity arose, since most of the gaming world now had access to broadband in some form or another, the market analysts and board of directors of several companies got together and had an idea.....That Idea was Paid Downloadable content.

No longer would content from the developer be free and paid expansion boxes fell into a rapid decline. This was met with immediate cynisim from the modding community and rightfully so, the once harmonious relationship was to be ended in bitter divorce.

The developers for the most stopped open sourcing there code to the modding communites, copyright laws were tightened, several modders were handed "cease and desist" letters as the big corporations began to take charge and tighten there hold around the new paid DLC foothold they had created, I still believe this move was partially responsible for the formation of such groups as Anonymous and Lulzsec as many former "White Hat" coders became "Grey or Black Hat" in defiance of what could only be described as "bully boy tactics".

Fast forward to today and our first case study FFXIII-2.

When I first heard that Square-Enix would be making DLC for FFXIII-2 I felt we may actually see some worthwhile stuff, such as new epic encounters and areas, extra story and the such, but what did we get?

Skins for already existing characters and not at a price I'd call reasonable for what was offered either.

SE clearly forgot what the C stands for in DLC, skins are NOT content in any way, shape or form, they are merely different looks and do nothing to alter or enhance the gameplay outside of making your characters look prettier/more badass.

And the price? Lets just say it gave me a good laugh as it probably did for many of you!

But they are not the only one pulling this stunt, Saints Row the Third is also highly notorious for it's premium priced skin packs, at the time of writing there are at least 9 different packs of skins that don't really alter anything as far as functionality goes and the new weapons and vehicles, although a welcome edition for some..don't justify the price tag that is asked for them.

The content extensions are also...far too short to command the price tag of nearly £15 for them (I know, I purchased the proffessor genki's extended reality pack, I was exceptionally annoyed when I completed it all within an hour)

Then we get to the ultimate finger in the face of the gamer, once again Bioware EA being the orchestrator with Mass Effect 3's micro transactions!

Firstly I will go on record and state clearly, once again EA are guilty of false advertising (is there any wonder they beat out the banks to become worst company in America?) The Resurgence pack was pipped as entirely free content....but here is where that becomes a lie.

In order to fully access and enjoy all the new features, weapons and classes brought in for multiplayer with Resurgence...You have to buy the Packs from the micro transaction shop SEVERAL times!

Now some of you are now thinking "T.I.M you can earn credits to buy them"...Yes you can, but the Spectre pack and Limited Resurgence packs are A: Extremely expensive credit wise requiring you to be able to play for hours upon hours a day to unlock all content B: RNG producing duplicates of what you already have more often than not.

And then we fall to the point of the post, launch day DLC, again Mass Effect 3 being extremely guilty of it.

From the Ashes DLC came out on day 1 with a price tag of 800 Bioware points (£9.00 to you and me) for what I'd say is pretty much neccessary content as Javik the Prothean plays a huge role throughout your game experience, throw that on top of the price tag for those that went out and bought Mass Effect 3 on release (I didn't personally, I actually waited until it came down in price as I thought £50 was disgusting) you were paying through the nose for a completed product to have more micro transactions thrown in on top which all in all .....(excuse my french) pissed me off to no end.

Is this what it has come to? Are we going to have to pay through the nose everytime we want the full experience? Are we really going to be asked to dip our hand in our pockets everytime we might fancy a new look? And just when does DLC stop being DLC and quite simply another way for the games companies to money spin for there shareholders?

I leave you to decide for yourselves if you feel DLC of today is worth it's price tag or not, but for me personally...I am sick of being ripped off just because someone fancies another holiday to Bermuda on top of the 5 they already had this year!
0 Thanks, 0 Likes
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Big Casino's Avatar
    The worst is when the alleged DLC is already on the disk. And what your actually paying for is not DLC but content already on the game you just bought, its just not available to you. You bought the game you should be entitled to have everything thats on it. Releasing a game then having content locked DLC out the same day is just a fucking cheek. As if its not enough that theyre packing games with multiplayer codes that allow one person to activate the online play leaving the next person (assuming the game is sold on) to have to fork out money just to play online.

    You know why people buy games second hand? Cuz its fucking cheaper. £45 a new game is a high high price and when your not even getting everything thats stored on it do you really wonder why people buy used games? Its all about getting as much for your money as you can and right now wer not getting very much at all. Capcom, which was one of my favourite developers back in the day are the absolute greediest of them all. Theyre well known for having content on the disk and charging big money to unlock it. In Japan they were charging for a demo...yep thats right, a downloadable demo! Need i have to say just how utterly ridiculous that idea is? Or imagine this. Being charged to use cheat codes? Sounds like mad talk doesnt it? Guilty again Capcom.

    I completely agree. Wer getting shagged out our money and its not right. And yeah yeah people will say well.. you dont haaaaave to buy it. I know i dont, and i fucking wont (99% of the time) But just because i dont have to buy it, sure as fuck doesnt make it right.
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes
  2. L's Avatar
    I don't have such a big problem with DLC, but it is when things like Serah's Bathing Suit outfit is put up for 240 MCPs - I really just have to sigh.

    No one pays for porn, why would they pay to see a character parade around in a bikini? is this supposed to come with a complimentary blowjob or lapdance?
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes
  3. Mitsuki's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Casino
    The worst is when the alleged DLC is already on the disk. And what your actually paying for is not DLC but content already on the game you just bought, its just not available to you. You bought the game you should be entitled to have everything thats on it. Releasing a game then having content locked DLC out the same day is just a fucking cheek. As if its not enough that theyre packing games with multiplayer codes that allow one person to activate the online play leaving the next person (assuming the game is sold on) to have to fork out money just to play online.

    You know why people buy games second hand? Cuz its fucking cheaper. £45 a new game is a high high price and when your not even getting everything thats stored on it do you really wonder why people buy used games? Its all about getting as much for your money as you can and right now wer not getting very much at all. Capcom, which was one of my favourite developers back in the day are the absolute greediest of them all. Theyre well known for having content on the disk and charging big money to unlock it. In Japan they were charging for a demo...yep thats right, a downloadable demo! Need i have to say just how utterly ridiculous that idea is? Or imagine this. Being charged to use cheat codes? Sounds like mad talk doesnt it? Guilty again Capcom.

    I completely agree. Wer getting shagged out our money and its not right. And yeah yeah people will say well.. you dont haaaaave to buy it. I know i dont, and i fucking wont (99% of the time) But just because i dont have to buy it, sure as fuck doesnt make it right.

    This.

    I've been ranting about the gaming industry and the direction they are taking with the DLCs. Video game sales are down, and people are being a lot more careful with what they buy on disc. I don't condone DLCs that are purposely left out on the game when it hits the market, only to release the DLC on the same day or a few days after. That's just stupid.
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes
  4. Cyberdelius's Avatar
    I'm very picky when it comes to DLC. If it's on-disk DLC, I won't support it. I bought the game, it's on the disk, I should have access to it. There is not excuse for that and I will never support it. However, if it's DLC that was made after the initial release of the game, then I may support it. It honestly depends on how much content there is. In the case of Activision and their horrid "buy four maps for $15" DLC deals, I will never support it. Back in the day we used to get maps for free. If we never got maps, the community started making them and they were typically much higher quality than anything the devs would put out.

    Now days, it seems like DLC is offering less and less for more money. To make matters worse it seems that devs and publishes alike think for some odd reason this replaces expansion packs.

    It doesn't.

    Imagine getting a burger. For a dollar you can get some fries, and for another dollar you can get a drink. Sounds like a good deal. You get two extra things that expand your burger eating experience. That's expansion packs.

    DLC has become something like this: You go to Burger King and order a burger. They give you half of it, and want you to pay for the last 50% of it in 10% increments that cost about $5 each.

    That's silly.

    And then you have people that say, "oh, well you don't have to buy it." That's exactly why companies like EA and Activision will continue to get away with it time and time again.
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes
  5. .The Joker's Avatar
    I hate DLC. I've never bought DLC and I never plan to. Games in Australia are $100. Why on earth do companies think I want to spend any more than that on a game?
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes
  6. The Illusive Man's Avatar
    I'm glad to see the discussion over the issue of DLC is very much one we all share a common view point on and thanks to Lew for pointing out the issue of on the disk DLC, something else that irks me as well.

    I would definatley say Ringos burger analogy pretty much sums up how DLC is these days "You want the rest, better prepare to pay for it"...If only people were more willing to vote with there wallets when it comes to DLC like many of us did when it came to the barded horse armor DLC back in Elder Scrolls: Oblivion we may actually hurt the industry enough to make them see that we as the consumer are not buying into there garbage.

    I was talking to a friend at work over the issue just last night. He of course is a call of duty player and I made note of the Activision content pass with it's mighty pricetag of £100.

    My friend originally was thinking it was good value for money, then I asked him what he actually got for his £100...his answer.

    "Uhh a few maps, couple of game modes"

    At this point I had to contain my laughter as not to seem rude and said to him "Mate, you know they used to do this stuff for free?"

    He paused for a moment and I could see his expression shift to anger as it dawned on him that he had been one of several other million customers that had bought into Activisions lies, his answer... "So I've paid all that money for fuck all then...what a set of greedy bastards" I told him he wasn't the only one that had fell victim to the bells and whistles of the marketting machine of the games corporations and he most definatley wouldn't be the last.

    But this made me realise something, for every person that obstains from buying DLC there are always at least 3 other people that do, but that said slowly but surely even those that are buying it are becoming aware either through word of mouth or the internet that they are being ripped off.

    My only hope is the people that don't buy begins to outnumber the people that do, before they really start ripping the player off and effectively make you buy the game 3-4 times over before you get to play the complete experience!
    0 Thanks, 0 Likes